Share.

    35 Kommentare

    1. BreadSniffer3000 on

      You mean a jet built for dogfighting beats one built for stealth at dogfighting?

      Shocker.

    2. Ok-Current5512 on

      So? The F-35 is a stealth close air support fighter, realistically it’ll never see a gun dogfight.

    3. 1_Upminster on

      Title is misleading. It was the combination of plane and pilot that beat another combination of plane and pilot, so we don’t know ( yet ) if the plane was better or if the pilot was better. Maybe both.

    4. AgitatedTowel1563 on

      People think jets these days go around in circles and shoot each other with cannons like in olden days?

    5. Bicentennial_Douche on

      If F-35 finds itself in a dogfight, it has already failed. It’s not meant to dogfight, it’s meant to destroy the enemy before the enemy even knows the F-35 is there. 

    6. Lopsided-Farm4122 on

      The F-35 would never dogfight in a real war scenario. It would destroy the Rafale before it ever knew it was there. They don’t spend all that money on stealth for no reason. These types of comparisons are pointless and mean nothing.

    7. kallisto19988 on

      Guys, I know you don’t like Trump, but be for real, the F-35 would never have been detected by the Rafale.

    8. No_Detail9259 on

      Lol. You guys. The purpose of the f35 is to enrich the manufacturer. Thats it.

    9. Scary_Woodpecker_110 on

      This is very well known. It’s stealth coating destroys it’s aerodynamics.

    10. Correct-Explorer-692 on

      I’m curious, what will happen in the future when both sides will have stealth jets? Will they end up in a dogfight?

    11. TheoryOfDevolution on

      The F-35 isn’t built for dogfighting.

      Dogfighting certainly didn’t help the Rafale that got shot down in Operation Sindoor.

    12. A-Lewd-Khajiit on

      Wasn’t meant for that anyways since it could fire a missile outside of visual range or something

    13. Obviously, in a much more realistic fight, the F-35 would launch its missiles much before the Rafale would and the Rafale would probably perish by the simple probabilities of the missiles connecting.

      But that’s the point of these exercises that test highly specific scenarios that are not necessarily realistic. For example, the F-35 pilot may have made an error or the plane was not optimized for a specific maneuver that was tested here and can then learn from this.

      Anyway, the Pentagon expects that air-to-air battles, which already happen at commonly 60-100km+ will happen at far greater distance over the next few decades. That will hit 4th gen jets like Rafale with minimal stealth features much harder than the F-35.

      That is why every country with either the money or tech wants jets with substantial stealth features whereas 4th gen jets are relegated to e.g. lobbing stand-off missiles or operating if air superiority has been achieved. That is for example exactly how Israel is expected to use the F-15IA’s they are procuring. After all, e.g. internal carrying necessarily massively limits the size of weapons that can be carried.

    14. defaultsubs_suck on

      Jesus dont say that. Canada will take another decade deciding which jet to buy.

    15. QuestGalaxy on

      So what? These news are kind of dumb, as dogfighting is not really relevant for a modern jet like the F-35.

      I’m all about supporting European products, but „news“ like these are just dumb.

    16. Context with broader information regarding the superiority of the F35

      This was stated by French pilots btw (pictures are attached on the link)

      „The technological asymmetry is now clear: French pilots regularly facing 5th generation fighters in joint exercises note that ‘the combat mission against stealth fighters on Rafale is impossible to win with the current state of sensors’.“

      So no, the Rafale is not superior to the F35

      [Statements by French Pilots](https://imgur.com/a/zAUF20C)

    17. PackTactics on

      „If you remove the ammunition. A sword beats a gun everytime.“ type shit is this?

    18. Now put it against the f-22 and see how far away the f-22 scores a kill from

    19. Main-Tutor-8432 on

      Almost every modern jet fighter beats F-35 in a dogfight. The plane is not made for dogfighting. It’s made to roflstomp any other plane from 100 kilometers away before they have any chance of even detecting the F-35. Dogfighting is just not something it would ever do. Rafale is a great fighter. But it’s simply obsolete compared to stealth planes, which is why we need to develop our own 6th generation planes as quickly as possible.

    20. StayGoldMcCoy on

      The F-16 beats the F-35 in a dogfight. F-35 will kill before it gets into dogfight range or it will fail.

    21. StockOpening7328 on

      I mean the picture of the so called „kill“ Is taken from a targeting pod. So it isn’t even proof for a kill. They‘re both capable aircrafts in a dogfight (the Rafale perhaps more so) but in a real Engagement the Rafale wouldn’t stand a chance against the F-35 as it would be defeated in the BVR realm.

    22. Canadianman22 on

      In a real world fight the F-35 would have downed the Rafale before it ever knew they were in the same airspace. Gone are the days of dog fighting aircraft.

      Pakistan shot the Rafale down easily.

    23. Rosu_Aprins on

      I don’t know why people are so anal that the test that was specifically to simulate a dogfight simulated a dogfight, armies train and test their equipment for all kind of scenarios.

    24. iamnosuperman123 on

      A lot of people in the thread are fighting over which is better in this scenario. Ultimately even if one was better at this scenario than the other the actual difference is probably not that huge and pilot skill/luck probably plays a much bigger role in this situation.

    25. tombiscotti on

      The present and future of air defense are drones. Cheap drones, masses of them. Fast and quick to built drones. Not super expensive manned fighter aircraft craft.

      Drones is what we as Europe need to invest in. Learn from Ukraine, license their technology, help them and supply them more drones to defend themselves and our European freedom and values.

    26. FourArmsFiveLegs on

      Well that article was clickbait. It just gives all these reasons as to why it’s not a big deal

    27. The F-35 isn’t built for dogfights, it’s built for stealth. It will eliminate the target without the target even knowing its there. It should never even get into a dogfight

    Leave A Reply