Share.

    22 Kommentare

    1. andtellmethis on

      Might be a silly question but could someone shed some light on why he was named when so many others aren’t?

    2. I think people are generally unaware of how broad the definition of child sexual abuse imagery is. It includes images of a child, obviously, but also drawings or written text. It also includes any image or text in which someone is represented as a child, whether or not they are in fact a child. Also audio recordings.

      It’s also one of the crimes over which we claim universal jurisdiction, if I remember correctly.

    3. Alot of people on this sub are getting very very nervous I reckon. 😂😂

    4. Targeting animation is a bit ironic.

      Japanese hentai. That’s all that needs to be said.

    5. Yama_retired2024 on

      Ironically there’s a an A.I robotics company that wants to produce „child sex bots“ to what they say would combat sexual abuse of children..

      And yet no one wants to look into that aspect

    6. FeistyPromise6576 on

      Honestly it seems a bit daft we’re prosecuting people over anime. Yeah, its icky and weird but so is adult anime porn imo. I get why regular CSAM is banned and agree it makes sense but no kids are being harmed by whatever weird drawings some japanese lad made any more than anyone’s harmed when someone draws a dobby the house elf having sex or whatever weird fantasy people want to draw.

    7. Why are we (the taxpayers) paying for legal aid for an English guy who was transiting through here on his way elsewhere? Or am I misreading something?

    8. interfaceconfig on

      He should go with the classic Reddit hentai defence -„she may look like she’s 12 but she’s actually a 650 year old witch“

    9. AluminiumCrackers on

      Wouldn’t be surprised if this was thrown out for an illegal search, or at least sent to a higher court for a decision on it.

    Leave A Reply