Erinnert sich noch jemand an diesen zufälligen Zuschauer, der die offizielle 9/11 -Geschichte sofort kannte?
Von mermaidmanis
Erinnert sich noch jemand an diesen zufälligen Zuschauer, der die offizielle 9/11 -Geschichte sofort kannte?
Von mermaidmanis
16 Kommentare
Submission statement: Mark Walsh sure knew a lot. And that suit in the background definitely wasn’t suspicious at all
This and the found intact passport are what I use to talk to normies about 9/11
A freelancer just happens to know the official narrative that took years to conclude in a couple of hours? Sure, Jan.
Isn’t it funny how every event like this already has some random person interviewed that knew everything that happen before it was even over?
He’s MIB. They don’t only wear suits.
He was there to „witness the event.“
Also, everything he said was wrong. His statement proves the narrative by NIST was pre-written.
Flipping up the 666 hand sign when hes saying ‚from beginning to end‘ too. Crazy shit man.
lol this is such an obvious overdub audio dude…
This interview was one of my first real-time clues that this was something more fucky than they were letting on about.
My only issue would be, are we then to assume that the local reporter, camera crew, and mic guys were presented with a „random citizen“ to spontaneously interview? Didn’t they find that immediately suspicious? How come they’ve never spoken up?
This is not a defense of the official narrative.
„…mostly due to structural failure because the fire was too intense.“
How many times do you think he practiced that line?
What the fuck. This is terrifying. Definitely a spook hammering home talking points. Such a rehearsed way of speaking and a weird unbothered demeanor. The reporter is confused and stammering, and this motherfucker is just yapping away without a pause. Truly demonic.
This is none other than „Harley Guy.“ He’s the guy who first told us why the towers fell. The fire was just too hot and the steel was weakened.
I know. The guy is a child prodigy. An ordinary structural engineer would have taken the better part of a half hour to come up with that. This Journalism major who worked as a stringer for FOX News had it right away. And so did his handler in the black suit. It was amazing. And it wound up corresponding exactly what that very nervous H1B guy told us about no explosive residue in the hi rise building that just fell down having been hit by nothing. Totally believable.
Want to have some fun? Sit a Baby Boomer down and explain to them this analogy: Say I had a blender, a toaster, a television set, and bathroom scale. Which of these is the truth dispenser?
Watch what happens. Having arrived during the extreme tail end of that myself, I can tell you from personal experience that there was a time when it was simply assumed that ABC News, the Washington Post, and Time Magazine all printed non-biased truth. If you said that they flat out lied about what happened to JFK and Walter Cronkite was at best a stooge, they would side eye you about freedom of the press.
As such, there are still people who believe what they believe about things like 9/11 and the Moon because „we all watched it on TV.“
„They framed Nixon.“ – Bill Murray
Hahahahaha as he slips in “mostly due to structure failure” like he’s reading from a teleprompter. Good times. It’s wild how we can see so clearly through this bullshit now. I was a kid when this occurred. I’m not a kid anymore and I don’t have to believe their bullshit.
Good lord the flashbacks from watching this. I remember this very interview like it was yesterday. I knew this would change things, but I had no clue of the extent it would be carried. This is it right here. This is was last step off the edge of normal “then” and what we have today. We were literally watching the beginning of all the lunacy we deal with today.
Lmao, this dude is talking like he is reading a prompt
Dude in the suit behind him was eyeballing everyone around Mr. Random Bystander like he was the fucking president