Grafik von mir, erstellt in Excel. Alle Daten von US -Volkszählung hier: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-total-metro-and-micro-statistical-areas.html

    Ich habe in der Vergangenheit ähnliche Grafiken erstellt, aber normalerweise von 2020 bis 2024. Dies ist nicht der beste Zeitrahmen, da es die abnormalen Covid -Jahre mit postpandemischer Bewegung kombiniert.

    Dieser Zeitrahmen (2022-2024) zeigt die aktuellsten und anhaltendsten Bevölkerungstrends der letzten 2 Jahre.

    Ich wollte auch die Städte besser in breite kulturelle Regionen als in den willkürlichen Geografischen Volkszählungsregionen einteilen.

    Von TA-MajestyPalm

    Share.

    11 Kommentare

    1. TA-MajestyPalm on

      Required comment:

      Graphic by me, created in Excel.

      All data from US Census here: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-total-metro-and-micro-statistical-areas.html

      I’ve created similar graphics in the past, but usually from 2020-2024. This is not the best time frame as it combines the abnormal covid years with post-pandemic movement.

      This time frame (2022-2024) shows the most current and ongoing population trends of the last 2 years.

      I also wanted to better categorize the cities into broad cultural regions vs the arbitrary geographic census regions.

    2. LittleMsSavoirFaire on

      Are people primarily moving to metro areas? Because I live in the purple region and we’re getting swarmed with highly paid telecommuters from NoVa and Charlotte. They’re like „I get three times the lifestyle here if I’m willing to drive three hours once a week.“ 

      It’s less than it was in covid but it’s still happening 

    3. Rarewear_fan on

      Interesting stats that are often divorced by what many Reddit users claim. Go on any board related to moving or where specifically Americans talk about their lives, and many are saying cities like Pittsburgh, Chicago, Detroit, and Cleveland are popping off, tons of people moving there, great places to live now, etc.

      Now they have definitely gotten better in the last 10 years so there is truth, but the midwest and Northeast are not really growing anymore. In the South east it has popped off so much that house prices and property tax rates have exploded since COVID. They are stabilizing now, but the main driver for people moving (economic opportunity) has really gone up in the south along with the wealth it brought compared to even the 2000s.

    4. Worried-Ebb8051 on

      Love the regional categorization approach!

      The Austin vs Miami contrast is striking – both „hot“ markets but completely different trajectories. Austin’s plateau might reflect the tech correction and remote work normalization, while Miami’s continued growth suggests lifestyle migration is more durable than job-driven moves. The Southeast’s dominance really reinforces the „no state income tax“ migration theory. Would be interesting to see this correlated with housing affordability metrics.

    5. ballsonthewall on

      It’s interesting how the city of Pittsburgh is growing despite the metro taking a little population loss. I think the trend of the 20th century might be starting to reverse based on climate change, COL, and younger people’s desires for more diverse, accessible, and urban communities. The suburban ponzi scheme is clearly up for many of our „middle“ suburbs (no hate on Penn Hills but that’s a great example), whereas the city is starting to see growth, development, and revitalization in places like Allentown, Uptown, and Garfield.

    6. Boundaries-ALO-TBSOL on

      ORLANDO IS N.1 LETS GO!

      Wait, this is a good thing or a bad thing?

    7. albertoshabazz on

      This is a nice graph. I would be interested to see it using only like 18-24 year olds (or a similar age range) to get a sense of where younger people at the start of their journey are choosing to settle.

      I wonder if millenials/genX are all about their own individual „experiences“, so they move out West where its sunny/outdoorsy and they’re like completely liberated away from the control structures back home, and the old silent/boomers of the MidWest/NorthEast are moving where its warm/dying off. So on a total population basis a place like PGH would show stagnation/decline. But for a fresh young person, perhaps cost of living, everyday utility, and a less, shall we say, individualistic environment might be more enticing (so a place like PGH might be more enticing).

    8. RachelRegina on

      Now that y’all voted in this guy, you can expect the northern half of the country to slowly get all of the population increases going forward (since we’re apparently fully committing to the world going up in flames).

    9. Waste_Molasses_936 on

      No wonder I-4 has gone from bad to abysmal since 2020. What used to take 1.5 hours from Tampa to Orland for the last 30 years is now: 1.5 hours to ???? at any time of day

    10. seanofkelley on

      I know alot of these trends and have seen them before and every time I see them all I can think is „it seems bad to me that the places that are being most damaged by climate change are also the places the most people are moving to“

    11. Ugh. As someone who grew up near Orlando, this new wave of people is the absolute worst. They’re trying to escape the crappy conditions of their home town, but just end up dragging it all down here.

    Leave A Reply