Denken Sie daran, dass uns vor 20 Jahren gesagt wurde, dass Dublin 2025 so aussehen würde, und die Entwickler haben immer noch Schwierigkeiten, in 15 Stockwerken die Planung für Gebäude zu erhalten. Möchten Sie Dublin mit größeren Gebäuden sehen?

    https://i.redd.it/llazy146n8jf1.png

    Von Pupcup2

    Share.

    24 Kommentare

    1. HighDeltaVee on

      Nah, see all of those tall buildings are each getting in the way of the other tall buildings.

      Can’t be having it.

    2. Better-Percentage177 on

      No way. Why would you want to add high density housing at a time of acute housing scarcity

    3. houdt_koers on

      I love the thousands of people living within smelling distance of the waste management infrastructure on Poolbeg.

    4. No, I love all the derelict 2 storey buildings in the city centre. That’s what Dublin needs, not those nice tall buildings you see in other capitals. 

    5. Could’ve invested €2 billion into taller buildings / apartment housing instead of a hospital.

    6. sCREAMINGcAMMELcASE on

      Every response so far is “no” and “no, lol”. Feck sake.

      It should be done. There’s no need for Dublin’s port to be industrial. Industry should land at Waterford or something. Dublin is a bottleneck with traffic.

    7. We weren’t told that this was what Dublin would like. It was a proposal or really just more a notion, to move Dublin port, and redevelop the land. A proposal that was shot down pretty much immediately and never progressed to even the beginning stage.

    8. _LightEmittingDiode_ on

      I have to say, as someone who lived in NA this sickens me. I lived in Vancouver and this is exactly what that city achieved. To the see the skyline of the city in the 80s vs now – one of the most iconic city skylines in the world, while maintaining a very “livable” city, focusing on transport links and parks. We had an opportunity to keep what historic buildings we had in the core, and the density there, while building a whole new city centre. Instead we have our major employers having to make compromises cause we can’t have anything over like 10 floors. Both sides of the docks are such a wasted opportunity. We have been shafted with conservatism, NIMBYISM, and self serving senior civil servants, politicians. If only we hired some Scandinavian/Dutch urban designers…

    9. EdWoodwardsPA on

      Thank God. I’m actually done with two story houses as well, we need to mass build bungalows in the city center. I need to see the spire.

    10. karlywarly73 on

      I remember this was the Progressive Democrats idea. We should have done it. Paris has La Defence. Its high rise, it looks great and it’s far enough away from the centre of Paris to be a distraction.

    11. Terrible_Biscotti_16 on

      Thank goodness it didn’t happen or we’d have lost Dublins iconic skyline forever /s

    12. Heatproof-Snowman on

      Ironically the part they keep green and undeveloped in this visualisation looks like it might be around the Grand Canal Square, which was actually quite nicely developed.

    13. Looking better.

      Sorry to say, Dublin is one of the ugliest cities in Europe.

    14. interfaceconfig on

      This was never a plan, it was mostly just an image to impress simpletons, which apparently it is still doing in 2025.

    15. AnyAssistance4197 on

      I’d love a city where first and foremost community and people were allowed to thrive. If we don’t value that and just focus on big shined buildings we will end up like London – and anyone that has been in the centre of that in the last decade will know it’s a place devoid of actual life after a certain hour. This is not an anti-development argument, it’s an argument for the right kind of development.

    16. UngodlyTemptations on

      We were robbed of a gorgeous skyline. Old farts and their height restrictions. But no, we’ve a junkies needle instead that costs 1.5 million a year to clean.

    Leave A Reply