Share.

    4 Kommentare

    1. >That future could start soon, with Trump & company issuing demands for separate, transactional “deals” with Canada on the one hand, and Mexico on the other – the kind of U.S.-centric arrangements that Canada sidestepped when it convinced the George H. W. Bush administration to pursue three-way trade back in the early 1990s.

      Yes, I’m glad someone is willing to say it out loud. It’s pretty clear that the Mexican government already sees that this is the most likely strategy and is focusing on one-on-one negotiations with the US. Canada still seems to be operating in a world where we expect to have a chance of negotiating a trilateral deal next year. Mexico refusing to meet with our two cabinet minister delegation a couple weeks ago should have been a wakeup call, but I’m not convinced the message has gotten through on our side.

    2. It’s [CUSMA](https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/cusma-aceum/index.aspx?lang=eng) or [ACEUM](https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/cusma-aceum/index.aspx?lang=fra) Globe and Mail….

      You’re Canadian. Use the Canadian acronyms not the U.S. one… hell even use the Mexican one [T-MEC](https://www.gob.mx/t-mec) before you degrade yourself by using the U.S. version.

      Elbows up!

    3. Numerous-Bike-4951 on

      1+1 =2

      Carneys using CUSMA to buy us time , but he doesn’t like it at all , watch his demeanor during the Whitehouse visit and tell me you’ve seen Carney any more tense than when he brings up CUSMA in that room .

      NAFTA and CUSMA are literally the heart of our previous relationship with America, economic,culturally, and diplomatically.

      In my opinion, Carney was always talking about CUSMA when he said the old relationship is over .

      -White house meeting

      „People haven’t followed it, but it was a transitional step a little bit. And as you know, it terminates fairly shortly. It gets renegotiated very shortly“

      Trump

      „NAFTA was the worst trade deal in the history of our country, probably in the history of the world, and this was a transitional deal, and we’ll see what happens. You know, we’re going to be starting to possibly renegotiate that if it’s even necessary. I don’t know that it’s necessary anymore, but it served a very good purpose.“

      Trump

      „The USMCA is great for all countries. It’s good for all countries. We do have a negotiation coming up over the next year or so to adjust it or terminate.

      Trump

      Id encourage you to watch Carneys demeanor and body language when he says this .

      „I’ll say a word on USMCS, if I may, Mr. president. It is a basis for a broader negotiation. Some things about it are going to have to change. And part of the way you’ve conducted these tariffs has taken advantage of existing aspects of USMCA, so it’s going to have to change. There’s other elements that have come and that’s part of what we’re going to discuss.“

      Carney

    4. Bitwhys2003 on

      “ to make foreigners pay for the privilege of exporting there.“

      Failing to point out that isn’t how import tariffs work makes it clear to me this article is meant to prop up Trump’s attack and make Canada look weak. C.D. Howe so no surprise

      CUSMA remains in place as long as we don’t sign anything. If Trump thought he could get away with axing the agreement without serious resistance he would have already so when he does know he knows he’ll be playing a long shot. If he doesn’t try axe it before the mid terms he won’t after

    Leave A Reply