Share.

    2 Kommentare

    1. This latest move has serious implications and it’s unclear how things play out. On one hand, automakers have invested a ton of money into DEF systems. This decision feels like it’l instantly enable people and make them feel like they have a green light to strip out DEF systems from their trucks. Further, what incentive do consumers now have to fill their DEF tanks once empty, once software gets updated to allow for operation without DEF? This seems like a dangerous sliding scale. Obviously consumers, specifically this demographic, that don’t believe in climate change and or just feel all these devices do nothing but hurt power and overcomplicate things, are going to champion this and feel empowered. But what about future generations? What about protecting those that can’t change the future?

    2. If you look at this quote, he could easily be talking about fuel too…

      How’s it so hard to refil a liquid purchasable at any gas station at the same time?

      —-

      We have heard loud and clear from small businesses across the United States that the current DEF system is unacceptable. It is unacceptable that farmers, truckers, construction workers, and many other small businesses continually experience failures of diesel-powered equipment when they need it most—costing millions of dollars in lost productivity,” Zeldin insisted. “Today, we are responding to those concerns by calling on manufacturers to take action to update their software and eliminate the unnecessary sudden loss of power and frustrating shutdowns that too many Americans have experienced.”

    Leave A Reply