Nuklearexperten sagen, das Mischen von KI und Atomwaffen ist unvermeidlich | Das menschliche Urteil bleibt für den Start von Atomwaffen von zentraler Bedeutung. Experten sagen jedoch, dass es eine Frage ist, wann, nicht wenn künstliche Intelligenz in die gefährlichsten Systeme der Welt eingebacken wird.

    https://www.wired.com/story/nuclear-experts-say-mixing-ai-and-nuclear-weapons-is-inevitable/

    Share.

    19 Kommentare

    1. Yep. Certainly by some rogue dictatorship even if the major countries agree to ban it.

    2. „The people who study nuclear war for a living are certain that artificial intelligence will soon power the deadly weapons.

      “It’s going to find its way into everything.” 

      „We don’t understand how many AI systems work. They’re black boxes. Even if they weren’t, experts say, integrating them into the nuclear decisionmaking process would be a bad idea. Latiff has his own concerns about AI systems reinforcing confirmation bias. “I worry that even if the human is going to remain in control, just how meaningful that control is.”

      (article covers lots of different scenarios; hard to summarize)

    3. TheoremaEgregium on

      Well. So it’s a matter of when not if, that we all die in nuclear hellfire.

    4. CG_Oglethorpe on

      This concept is fascinating, someone should make a movie about it. Oh add in time travel to make it cooler.
      I am sure it will be a hopeful story about how humanity will come together at the last moment to ensure the worst doesn’t happen.

    5. podgladacz00 on

      Not current AI. Current AI is like literally a black box for most still. Not intelligent, not reasonable and mimicking intelligence so humans get fooled while talking with it. It can behave irrationally and without predictability and break rules made for it. If you are going to assign such flawed device to manage nuclear weapons might as well call it a day as I’m sure AI would not think twice about launching the rocket. There was a time during cold war when submarine lost all contact with base and thought it is new world war but they thankfully did not launch the rocket. AI would most likely fail this task.

    6. the_millenial_falcon on

      You have got to be fucking kidding me. Holy shit why do we even make sci fi? Just to give people shitty ideas?

    7. Well, I think people can understand the need for extreme caution when dealing with nuclear weapons… ?

    8. GrecianDesertUrn69 on

      My endless response to reading media doom reporting „AI will do fuckedup thing“ everyday: fucking why?

    9. Livid_Zucchini_1625 on

      Sci-Fi Author: In my book I invented the Torment Nexus as a cautionary tale

      Tech Company: At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from classic sci-fi novel Don’t Create The Torment Nexus

    10. Fluffy_Carpenter1377 on

      Isn’t this a sci-fi story plot that ends very badly for everyone, especially the survivors?

    11. Significant_Key_2888 on

      Why would ML be involved in the operation of nuclear weapons? The data involved is tiny and perfectly amenable to strictly human operation. The only place I can see a role for ML is aiding signal processing and target classification for identifying launchers or determining decoys.

    Leave A Reply