Share.

    8 Kommentare

    1. McNasty1Point0 on

      “We were perfect and the loss was due to factors out of our control but I will not run the next campaign” is quite the show of confidence lol

      I actually think this is good for the CPC, but I know damn well her fingers will still be in there. She will never fully leave a Poilievre-led CPC.

    2. Domainsetter on

      Does anyone think she won’t be at least involved somewhat? This isn’t her stepping down entirely from the role. Seems like they’re doing damage control before the by-election for some factor.

    3. Given how she never held a role outside of „senior advisor“ prior to the campaign, I’m not sure if this means much. She will still be second in command, and that’s what she used when she decided to meddle in nominations or attack PC politicians. Formal role is irrelevant when she has the job of enforcer.

    4. ph0enix1211 on

      Wishful thinking: does she see the writing on the wall regarding Pollievre’s prospects of having a good showing in the byelection and holding on to the leadership afterwards?

    5. >“I speak to people on a daily basis, and I’m going to continue to do that, but I’ve stepped back from the day to day, and I’m not going to run the next campaign,“ Byrne said Friday in a wide-ranging interview on the Beyond a Ballot podcast.

      Could it be? Could the Poilievre team be demonstrating a modicum of self-reflection?

      >But in her first public comments since Poilievre’s disappointing election loss this spring, Byrne expressed few regrets and fired back at those who have blamed her as campaign director and called for her ouster for the Conservatives‘ stunning fall from grace.

      It’s quite a thing to get shitcanned and then assert that you did nothing wrong. If only she’d ever had a real job she might know that that kind of talk doesn’t fly in your next interview.

      >“I think they were trying to bait us into talking about Trump. And from a practical point of view, I don’t know what we would have said every day.“

      What was it baiting, Jenny? What about talking about Trump would have baited something out of you? And what the hell do you mean you don’t know what you’d say every day? Disavow him! Loudly! Explicitly! Repeatedly! That’s *why* you lost. People didn’t believe Poilievre was actually opposed to Trump.

      >Attributing the shocking Liberal comeback to Trump’s rise and the NDP’s collapse, she expressed doubt any different decision would have changed the result of the election and said it was „strange“ how much focus people have placed on her role in analyzing the election result.

      Maybe… just maybe… it’s because you were entirely unable to shift messaging to address Trump. Maybe it’s because you personally did your best to cause the NDP collapse. Maybe it’s because no one believed that you and your ex had any quarrel with Trump and your continual refusal to confront that fact has only solidified it. Those are a few itsy bitsy reasons why you might be blamed.

      Welp. We’ll see if this indicates some self awareness from Poilievre, but from Byrne’s perspective she’s holding onto her did nothing wrong it’s all the woke Liberals schtick.

    6. Routine_Soup2022 on

      This is a nothingburger and has more to do with trying to satisfy the people with the knives out for the leadership review. It’s unlikely to sway too many people because I don’t think it actually means anything. The federal party will still bully the constituencies and shut out voices that try to provide feedback or local information. The line of command in this party goes Pierre Poilievre > Jenni Byrne > Communications Consultants followed by edicts from Pierre.

    7. Does she just leave this last election off her CV? Otherwise what does she write?

      „Unimaginably blew historic 25 point lead in just 4 months“?

    8. Yorbayuul81 on

      She’ll pop up as a first line right winger on the Leafs. They need another playoff choker now that Marner is gone.

    Leave A Reply