Share.

    11 Kommentare

    1. BadBadBenBernanke on

      With what money and planned by what staff? Last time I checked both of those were being cut at NASA.

    2. Again? HAHAHA!

      Good luck in the long term with shallow moonquakes that occur every two hours and last several minutes.

      Earth (and Sun) tides. Also, moon is cooling hence shrinking, crust cracks.

    3. ChocoPuddingCup on

      Sorry, why? The only real reason seems to be for making a ‚keep out zone‘ since actually owning land outside of Earth is prohibited via the UN. There needs to be long-term plans to doing things, not just deciding on a whim. Space is damn dangerous; five to six years to accomplish this is pretty ambitious, especially since our current government seems to enjoy slashing NASA’s budget.

    4. Dot_Classic on

      Cover story for about of taxpayer money that will vanish into a black hole of “studies” and “contracts” that will never actually lead to anything. It’s a scam.

    5. R-Dragon_Thunderzord on

      So, farmers can’t have a climate satellite they rely upon to plan their season, because the data is detrimentally against the narrative of climate change deniers, but we are going for nuclear reactors on the moon? Wow, love the priorities.

    6. Bowler_Pristine on

      We have not built one in the us for decades but hey let’s waste billions and build one on the moon, that makes sense!

    7. Evil_Eukaryote on

      All we want to do is put a few people up there for a few days.

      This is like asking your dad for a ride to work, but instead, he just promises to buy you a tractor trailer and then doesn’t take you to work.

    8. brickyardjimmy on

      How much would it cost to build a power plant on the moon? Just curious.

    9. LadyMhicWheels on

      There are so many sci-fi warning books about how we die if we fvck up the moon 🌝.

    Leave A Reply