Die NASA, um Pläne zum Aufbau eines Kernreaktors auf dem Mond bekannt zu geben
https://www.the-express.com/news/space-news/179377/nasa-nuclear-reactor-moon-duffy
Die NASA, um Pläne zum Aufbau eines Kernreaktors auf dem Mond bekannt zu geben
https://www.the-express.com/news/space-news/179377/nasa-nuclear-reactor-moon-duffy
6 Kommentare
Secretary of Transportation [Sean Duffy](https://www.the-express.com/news/politics/162382/transport-secretary-sean-duffy-cockpit) is expected to announce expedited plans to build a nuclear reactor on the Moon in what a senior [NASA](https://www.the-express.com/news/space-news/174680/nasas-voyager-spacecraft-discovered-wall) official called a bid to „win the second space race.“
Can’t have universal healthcare, but sure.. A reactor on the moon, why the fuck not?
>The first country to have a reactor could “declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States,” the directive states, according to POLITICO
Ah. There’s the real reason.
With what budget? Can we send ICE to the moon since they’ve got billions to burn?
Finally, something to help our citizens who are starving. Thank fucking god.
Very cool. I consider myself a Conservationalist but not an Environmentalist, and I’ve found lunar development to be a great way to distinguish between the two. I’ve encountered several people who think we should leave the lunar environment pristine, — for who, exactly? I don’t want our rivers polluted or our forest cut down to preserve human enjoyment, but the moon or Mars? Extract maximum value from them.