Wird Ihr Job KI überleben? – Harvard Gazette – Experte für die Zukunft der Arbeit sagt, dass es für schlimme Vorhersagen ein wenig früh ist, aber es gibt möglicherweise Anzeichen für erhebliche Veränderungen
Wird Ihr Job KI überleben? – Harvard Gazette – Experte für die Zukunft der Arbeit sagt, dass es für schlimme Vorhersagen ein wenig früh ist, aber es gibt möglicherweise Anzeichen für erhebliche Veränderungen
4 Kommentare
From the article
In recent weeks, several prominent executives at big employers such as Ford and J.P. Morgan Chase have been offering predictions that AI will result in large white-collar job losses.
Some tech leaders, including those at Amazon, OpenAI, and Meta have acknowledged that the latest wave of AI, called agentic AI, is much closer to radically transforming the workplace than even they had previously anticipated.
Dario Amodei, chief executive of AI firm Anthropic, said nearly half of all entry-level white-collar jobs in tech, finance, law, and consulting could be replaced or eliminated by AI.
Christopher Stanton, Marvin Bower Associate Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School, studies AI in the workplace and teaches an MBA course, “Managing the Future of Work.” In this edited conversation, Stanton explains why the latest generation of AI is evolving so rapidly and how it may shake up white-collar work.
AI will kill many so-called bullshit jobs for sure.
But I highly doubt that AI will lead to lower costs for consumers when these jobs are replaced.
Jobs are being taken. However I have not seen a single major article on the ones being created. Hundreds of billions are being spent each year on AI. Money is flowing – people are making money – it would be interesting to list those jobs and those people.
The future has change? No shit.
> The earliest versions of generative AI tools were prone to hallucinate and to provide answers that were inaccurate.
Every AI tool I’ve come across still do this to some extension.
> So, we are starting to see the uptake of these tools consistent with the narrative from these CEOs.
If this technology actually worked, then the shortsighted emotionally driven CEO would be one of the first to go.