Haben wir diesen Artikel bereits besprochen? Wir können diese Reaktion auch hier auf Reddit oft hören. Was denkst du darüber? Ist es nur eine natürliche menschliche Reaktion oder es steckt noch etwas dahinter, wie eine nicht erklärte Frustration?
https://www.luxtimes.lu/luxembourg/no-foreigners-should-not-just-go-home/79040346.html
Von Average-U234
4 Kommentare
It is not that they should go home. It is more that they have the freedom to go home. Not about Luxembourg but in general. If one comes „here“ and wants to change things so it is more as „back home“ and less „here“ why not use the freedom and go back?
I guess it is kinda a hot take.
I think the problem is subtlety, which is immediately lost on the internet. If I go to a place, adapt, integrate, make a life, and then say “hey, some of these things should change”, then from my perspective I’m trying to improve the place I now call home. But that might not be immediately obvious to someone listening to me, and they might think I’m just trying to make Luxembourg more like my home country without trying to understand it.
And it’s all over this Sunday opening „problem“? Laughable discusion by politicians that all qualify for no extra work towards their retirement.
As often, it depends!
If it’s something that people experience in countries more developed than Luxembourg, and particularly contributes to their development, then it’s something that should be considered
If it’s something that people experience in developing countries, and particularly justifies their underdevelopment, then we should not waste our efforts in making Luxembourg a less developed country. If it makes a group of people unhappy, then they are free to move
It’s irrelevant if it’s foreigners, locals, naturalized, or stateless people. Experience with how things are done elsewhere isn’t limited to foreigners