Nie verstanden, warum Narikala, eines der bekanntesten Sehenswürdigkeiten in Georgien, in 30 Jahren keine Regierung oder Bürgermeister renoviert wurde, und stellen Sie sich vor
Nie verstanden, warum Narikala, eines der bekanntesten Sehenswürdigkeiten in Georgien, in 30 Jahren keine Regierung oder Bürgermeister renoviert wurde, und stellen Sie sich vor
Everything that the Georgian Dream touches gets ruined. So it is better if they don’t do it
jandaba7 on
It has been refurbished to some extent in the past and there’s structural refurbishment underway at the moment.
Whether to rebuild actual ruins is a contentious subject, but it does seem like they could do more than they are from the state of it.
MediocreI_IRespond on
It would coast billions, take decades and would be an nightmare from an archaeologist perspective, while the major landmark would be more or less closed to the public. No on an insane level as the Parthenon, but close enough for a poor country as Georgia.
Better focus on preservation of the existing structure und focus an public infrastructure, with the latter you could also more easily develop similar sites, thereby taking pressure from the hotspots.
irecognizedyou on
it would draw to much attention and then you would have to say either „according to the legend…“ or admit that it was persian fortress
akatosh86 on
Such „renovations“ border on vandalism. That is why the Bagrati Cathedral is not in the UNESCO intangeable list anymore, because it’s basically a new building
Glo-kta on
You’re talking to/about the government that can’t repair the roof of one metro station
alexshatberg on
It’s prohibitively expensive and the results never look good. There’s a reason medieval castle ruins are almost never restored – modern construction methods don’t produce anything that looks authentic and replicating the medieval construction methods is an insane amount of work.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
7 Kommentare
Everything that the Georgian Dream touches gets ruined. So it is better if they don’t do it
It has been refurbished to some extent in the past and there’s structural refurbishment underway at the moment.
Whether to rebuild actual ruins is a contentious subject, but it does seem like they could do more than they are from the state of it.
It would coast billions, take decades and would be an nightmare from an archaeologist perspective, while the major landmark would be more or less closed to the public. No on an insane level as the Parthenon, but close enough for a poor country as Georgia.
Better focus on preservation of the existing structure und focus an public infrastructure, with the latter you could also more easily develop similar sites, thereby taking pressure from the hotspots.
it would draw to much attention and then you would have to say either „according to the legend…“ or admit that it was persian fortress
Such „renovations“ border on vandalism. That is why the Bagrati Cathedral is not in the UNESCO intangeable list anymore, because it’s basically a new building
You’re talking to/about the government that can’t repair the roof of one metro station
It’s prohibitively expensive and the results never look good. There’s a reason medieval castle ruins are almost never restored – modern construction methods don’t produce anything that looks authentic and replicating the medieval construction methods is an insane amount of work.