Close Menu
    Bruchstudie: mRNA-Injektionen induzieren schwere, lang anhaltende genetische Störungen im Zusammenhang mit Krebs und chronischen Erkrankungen
    Verschwörung

    Bruchstudie: mRNA-Injektionen induzieren schwere, lang anhaltende genetische Störungen im Zusammenhang mit Krebs und chronischen Erkrankungen

    Share.
    View 20 Comments

    20 Kommentare

    3. Sebas365 on

      If that’s so, we, as a human race need to change the focus from mRNA vaccines to more tradicional vaccines.

      The problem is that mRNA vaccines are used to prevent illness that doesn’t develop an inmunity once you got it first (like covid or common cold), and that’s the problem, since the mRNA is the basic structure of the virus is usef as a base to develop vaccines yearly, if it’s real that claim, a change is needed, this is not the vax cause autism, covid shots cause heart failure, this one is more real and serious claim.

    5. TruthHonor on

      This is a pre print and has ‘not’ been peer reviewed. I’ll wait, thanks.

    7. ejpusa on

      These are acceptable risks. The problem is when the government fails to tell people that.

      But it is on the form you signed, in a 3pt font. mRNA science is awesome, but it’s really early on.

      83 year olds with 3 comorbidities, it added a few months to their lives. But that was it. Eventually we have to go.

      But healthy young males, there is ZERO evidence they needed an “Experimental Vaccine”, absolutely zero. But MRNA shareholders were cheering that on. And then people lost faith, in science, and scientists. We put Wall Street Day Traders in charge of your healthcare.

      We can’t do that, ever again.

      Source: scientist retired.

      😀

    9. mongolnlloyd on

      If this is ever the case I fear for all the employees at JNJ, Moderna, Sanofi, NIH anyone who pushed the vax.

    10. Saint_Poolan on

      These actions happen with every viral/protein infection, may it be just mRNA or the RNA covered with mRNA (virus). Hell even microplastics could potentially disrupt genetic materials – though I’ve not seen any evidence for that.

      Truth is any foreign microorganism entering your body could severely disrupt your genetic materials, DNA. However it’s 10-20 times worse from a virus than an mRNA vaccine, if the virus is actually successful in fighting off your immune system & spread all across for many weeks, a lot of your organs are damaged permanently a lot of your DNA’s disrupted permanently & you could even die. This is 10000s of times worse than mRNA infections, why? because the mRNA is just the protein covering of the RNA & it doesn’t have the RNA & the RNA’s urge to multiply like hell & take over all of host’s organs. Older vaccines had the whole virus in them in a weakened or deactivated form with mRNA covering & RNA.

      So in the end you had your genetic material permanently disrupted by any virus including the flue if you ever caught one. So why is everyone not getting cancer & other chronic illnesses from defective/mutated DNA all the time? Two things,

      #1 Genetic repairs during cell divisions „In most cells, **an elevated level of DNA damage causes both an increased synthesis of repair enzymes and a delay in the cell cycle**. Both factors help to ensure that DNA damage is repaired before a cell divides“. DNAs are repaired all the time is the main reason we don’t get Cancer & chronic genetic diseases all the time. However not all cells could be repaired & they mutate into cancer cells then-

      #2 Killer T cells & Microphages kill mutated cancerous cells before they can become tumors. Truth is most people have mutated cells in their body all the times trying to replicate & form tumors & cancers. Mutations happen from a lot of chemicals from Alcohol to Nicotine to Chemicals in the workplace maybe even at home! However your immune system will be keep destroying (T cells) & eating (Microphages) these mutates cells before they can successfully become tumors. This is why most young people with good immune systems can get away with a lot of alcohol & nicotine abuse as their body will keep fighting the mutated cells.

    11. Ashamed_Rips on

      This is why we look at who sponsored the research. Just because it was a study doesn’t mean its true or real in facts and science.

      Let’s not forget Kellogg claimed cereal was healthy and good for you because of THEIR study. They have been sued a ton bc of it.

    13. Memowuv on

      From a very cursory glance it looks like they did genetic testing on people with cancer and other diseases who happened to be vaccinated and compared to healthy individuals. There were 7 with cancer and 3 with other problems. So they looked at 10 individuals total and compared them to 804 healthy subjects. They don’t say if the healthy subjects are vaccinated.

      They found genetic dysregulation in the 10 sick subjects. Isn’t that true for most people with cancer?

      So, they found genetic problems in 7 people with cancer. What is the smoking gun there since you’d find genetic anomalies in most people with cancer. Was there a specific finding true only for vaccinated subjects?

      Edit. They found genetic disruption linked to cancer and other diseases in people with cancer and other diseases. Doesn’t seem groundbreaking to me

    14. cinnamon_toastbrunch on

      Im starting to genuinely believe that I received the vax without my consent in some form or another. My health has taken a nose dive since covid despite not getting too sick and not getting a single jab. I’ve given up alcohol for 3 years, eating and exercising but my body is just falling apart at just 39 -40 yrs old and it makes no damn sense to any Dr’s.

      Edit: vax not tax

    15. ColdbloodedFireSnake on

      And last but not least looking back at the COVID Period, I took the jabs partly for myself but also for the people around me in poor health or the elderly. Not because I had to but because I choose to. Could I have been wrong by taking the jabs, maybe or maybe not. I did what I thought was best at the time based on all the information that was available and was brought by renowned scientists/doctors.

    16. seastair on

      Not peer reviewed, an n of 10, the “paper” is missing a gratuitous amount of detail, most of the authors work for a “bioscience” org that sells mRNA “repair kits” with an undisclosed price tag. Seems totally legit and not part of a grift at all.

    17. Milestogob4Isl33p on

      So a study group of 10, compared to a control of 830 healthy individuals. However, I couldn’t find any mention of whether the control group had ever received an mRNA injection or tested positive for Covid, only that they are healthy individuals.           

      They also say these individuals experienced symptoms soon after injection, but don’t define how soon, or any sort of time window that I could see. And why would they compare them to healthy individuals? Wouldn’t it make more sense to just do these tests on the same people, before and after mRNA injection? Like, they wouldn’t even need to specifically target people symptomatic after vaccination, because there would still be changes even without symptoms. 

    20. FakeNogar on

      It’s crazy how many people here are waiting to defer their thinking to an over-worked, underpaid peer-review mill that is just as open to corporate influence as the rest of the academic world. Pfizer alone has sold over $100 BILLION in covid vaccines over the past 4-5 years, does the public not know what incentives and motives are? People have commited murder for 0.0000000005% of that money. Read the study, read the methods, review the data yourself.

    Leave A Reply