Mit dem Verständnis, dass ein Quantencomputer in China eine mathematische Gleichung gelöst hat, die aktuelle Top -Server -Farms 2,6 Billon Jahre der Berechnungen einnehmen würde. Link unten hinzugefügt und hat sich als real nicht als Fälschung erwiesen:
Was bedeutet das für die aktuelle Bitcoin -Verschlüsselung? Bei Verwendung von ECC SHA-256-Verschlüsselungsmethoden wird angenommen, dass ein Quantencomputer, insbesondere bei der Geschwindigkeit, die wir ansteigt, einen Tag dauern würde, um ihn zu brechen.
https://myelectricssparks.com/china-jiuzhang-quantum-computer-2-6-6-billion-Jahr-problem/
A question about Quantum computing vs bitcoin encryption.
byu/Far-Signature-9628 inCryptoCurrency
5 Kommentare
It means BTC is screwed. They’ll have to hard fork to tackle the problem
quantum is pure hype and headlines, that’s what keeps the investment flowing into an otherwise cash burning business that doesn’t generate sustained revenues
there’s no guarantee they’ll ever be able to reach the level of cracking Bitcoin
i would sooner be worried about classical computers
It is a machine with 76 qubits. Estimates on the number of bits needed to hack Bitcoin are from 512 to tens of thousands. So wake me up when they can make a machine of that size
Its still a ways off but it will happen and btc will be no more. NIST already has standards for quantum safe encryption ready to go like kyber, dilithium. But they are untested. There are blockchain projects already looking to build on these concepts.
It’s a nothingburger. When quantum gets even remotely close to the level of being able to crack SHA-256, Bitcoin will already have a fork ready to go that prevents it and will reach full consensus to do it.
There’s wayyy too much riding on it to just let it get cracked at this point. It’s never going to happen.