Close Menu
    Vereinigtes Königreich

    Corbyn behauptet, 200.000 haben sich einer neuen Partei angemeldet

    Share.
    View 16 Comments

    16 Kommentare

    1. denyer-no1-fan on

      200,000 signed up to a new party’s _mailing list_.

      FTFY Mr. Corbyn.

    2. Logical-Brief-420 on

      And the crowd goes mild…. Because it’s not even a new party they’re signing up for but an email mailing list.

      Oooh look all the usual r/unitedkingdom commenters are here already. Opinions are like arseholes, everyone’s got one and they all stink. (Some more than others)

    3. BeardMonk1 on

      Yay. A weird party taking a chunk out of the Greens and the Labour party, splitting the left of UK politics still further and making it more likely that we get a reform gov.

    4. limeflavoured on

      Until its registered with the Electoral Commission its not a party. And for that it will need a name

    6. Mr_Rockmore on

      I cringe for all these people who are here to slander yet still claim to be liberals whilst supporting labour in its current form.

    7. potpan0 on

      Christ, there’s some intense levels of cope in these comments. People pivoting from insisting that no one cares about this new party, to now saying that *200,000 people* signing up for their initial consultations within one day are apparently meaningless.

      We’ve got 4 major parties in this country who support the economic status quo, and all of them are happy to scapegoat minority groups to deflect criticisms away from that economic status quo. It’ll be nice to have at least one party who challenges this, even if all the centrist dads are unhappy that everyone isn’t forced to support *their* party.

    8. AbbreviationsHot7662 on

      I mean Labour had 600k members under his leadership. Didn’t do much in the end.

    10. Greedy-Tutor3824 on

      This is the response to a continuously ambiguous labour. Blair and Starmer have heavily blurred what the party’s values are – people should know what they’re getting when they vote. I don’t think anyone voted for labour thinking ‘thank god we have another Tory party.’

    11. BusyBeeBridgette on

      Even with the tools he had, when leading a big party, to topple the Tories he failed miserably even when the Tories were in full stride of their incompetency era. All this will achieve is to further split the left’s vote.

    12. Valcenia on

      Really is a shame Labour stopped releasing their membership numbers when it became clear there was a continuous downward trend after Starmer became leader. Would love to be able to see how quickly they get eclipsed by this new party lol

    13. HotMachine9 on

      If it were anyone other than Corbyn id hope they geniunely succeed.

      Corbyn is a Russian asset who should never touch foreign policy

    14. Bloody_sock_puppet on

      I pre-signed up I suppose. I’ll actually sign up when it’s formally created.

      I simply think he’s owed the job of PM by this point, if only because the man has never experienced the free press his competitors have. He may not get it but at least this way he’ll likely end up the cabinet if they ever do succeed. Labour taking donations outside the unions and members after he was ousted is crime enough that I’ll never vote for them. Same with the Tories because of starting off Brexit, and Reform because my mother likes them. There’s no surer signifier of petty racism as she’s always been a single issue voter in favour of just that.

      Maybe it won’t work out perfectly as the media machine won’t let up on him, and the ‚friends of israel‘ are well funded. It’s still worth a try and he’ll almost certainly do *some* good in the attempt simply because nobody is paying him to act against us. That would be better than the sum total of everything the last four governments have achieved.

    15. WanderlustZero on

      ‚195,000 of those seem to be based in St Petersburg, but we are a broad church after all‘

    Leave A Reply