Share.

    9 Kommentare

    1. magasheepgotfleeced on

      Why are we offering a convicted pimp of children anything? Why does the DOJ need to talk to her if they closed the case? Why did they close the case if they still needed to talk to her?

      But most importantly, why out of everyone at the DOJ was Todd Blanche who just happens to be Trump’s criminal defense lawyer chosen to be the one who went?

    2. The only way to clear someone’s name is to get their buddy in jail to vouch for them.

    3. Shade_Raven on

      Ghislaine getting a pardon/reduced sentence/softer time in exchange for saying what the administration wants is such an obvious quid-pro-quo there’s no way the median voter goes for it….right?

    4. naw there’s no corruption of justice going on here — naw not at all . . .

    5. The conversations the major media messengers allow us to be exposed to, be it through Epstein conversations, or from just something for example like disgraced Princes from influential and powerful families, these major media messengers create momentum for a purpose.

      From that, the sudden exposition and frequency of news towards this subject, Epstein, is suspect due to its immediate repetition.

      From that, I believe this repitition is not circumstantial and random, but designed and intentional.

      Who would be able to make major news designed and intentional?

      A daughter of a major news company with a purpose and a unique access to expose and control perhaps?

      Whichever way you look at it though, there are some very powerful and dirty fuckin pedophiles thinking that they aren’t, involved in this.

    6. This makes Watergate look like a stroll in the park. How anyone can continue to support Trump at this point is beyond me.

    Leave A Reply