CRISPR-basierte Gen-Laufwerke können Malaria-Mücken auskleiden, indem sie Sterilitätsgene durch Wildpopulationen verbreiten. Eine zufällige Veröffentlichung könnte jedoch Ökosysteme zusammenbrechen:

    • 73% Nichtziel-Insektenverlust in begrenzten Versuchen (Naturkunde)

    • Keine globale Governance für grenzüberschreitende genetische Verschmutzung

    Eliminiert eine Krankheit, die 600.000 Leben/Jahr (hauptsächlich Kinder unter 5 Jahren) um ökologische Glücksspiele abtötet – das Risiko, Ökosysteme durch irreversible genetische Verschmutzung zu kollabieren?

    Gene Drives Could Eradicate Malaria But Risk Permanent Species Extinction. Should We Deploy Them?
    byu/Husabdul_9 inFuturology

    Share.

    3 Kommentare

    1. PlaneswalkerHuxley on

      73% loss is an insane number. You could drop a nuclear bomb on the habitat and there would be a higher survival rate.

      No, we should not deploy a biological weapon just because we have one. Small tests are done precisely because they can demonstrate these kinds of failures before a mass deployment – in this case the test has shown it is nowhere near ready.

      The talk of the annual death toll is just what-aboutism. The mass extinction of entire insect species could lead to a myriad of terrible effects; collapsing food webs, mass extinction, mass famine.

    2. HoppyPhantom on

      Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but is the fear that sterilizing malaria mosquitoes will collapse ecosystems because of the impact their absence will have on other insects that depend on their presence to survive? Or is it that the sterilized genetic trait could somehow cross over to other insects besides the malaria mosquitoes and therefore eliminate those species as well?

    3. SomeoneSomewhere1984 on

      I’m completely in favor of finding a way to wipe out mosquitoes. 

    Leave A Reply