Dies ist ohne Zweifel eine falsche Flagge. Port Arthur Massacre, Tasmanien, Australien.
Martin Bryant wurde noch nie als Schütze identifiziert.
Er war ein linker Hände, der Schütze wurde von Zeugen als rechtshändig gemeldet.
Die Verwendung von Gun wurde als zurückgekehrt an die Polizei von Victoria im Waffenrücklaufprogramm dokumentiert.
Zeitungen zirkulieren illegal das Foto von Schützen, bevor alle beteiligten Zeugen in der Lage waren, die rechtlichen Prozesse der Abgabe von Beschreibungen und Aussagen formell zu durchlaufen (Abdruckbilder und falsche Ereignisse nach dem Trauma).
Ein speziell gebautes 22 -Personen -Leichenwagen (eine Leichenhalle auf Rädern) in der Nähe des Massakers, noch kein Einheimischer, wurde kurz nach dem Massaker online verkauft.
All das hat so viel mehr. Es gibt die Präzision eines Schützen auf militärischer Ebene, der einen IQ von 60 (3yo-Kind) hatte. Die Polizei wurde auf einer wilden Gänsejagd (Heroinbüste auf einem Minenort, der sich als Seifepulverpulver herausstellte) abgeschickt. Zeugen, die erschossen wurden und dem Schützen offenbarten und feststellten, dass es sich nicht um einen blonden, hellhäutigen Schützen handelte. Ein ehemaliger Bürgermeister, der erklärt, dass es in Tasmanien ein Massaker einnehmen müsse, damit die Regierung etwas gegen Waffenkontrolle unternimmt. Die Liste geht weiter und weiter ..
Von Former_Rush1821
13 Kommentare
I don’t know anything but about this event but just sayin I’m a lefty but shoot like a righty. I imagine a lot of us do.
Too bad about all the [FUCKING EYEWITNESSES](http://Port Arthur: Witnesses recall horror of Martin Bryant’s mass shooting in Tasmania – ABC News https://share.google/9nhrAXOIM0x0Vfvku) who came face to face with Bryant and saw him shooting people.
I hope you never face something like this to find out i’m telling the truth, but eye witnesses during a crisis are ridiculously and notoriously unreliable.
You can’t rely on people to identify how many shooters are in mass shootings. You 100% cannot rely on people to reliably remember if the person was left or right handed.
This is why you think every shooting is a false flag. Because every mass shooting has these in-discrepancies from eye witnesses. You should connect the dots and see that because EVERY SINGLE shooting has something like this, it means it’s actually real.
Yeah it’s a good one, excellent accuracy with high headshot percentage from a suppose low IQ person, left/right handed issue and the mortuary bought and sold just within the Port Arthur incident and also the biggest in the nation at the time too for the smallest state in the country!
What about the comment during the shooting “No not in here!” as the ones “working” on the setup yet were going to be killed during it were told 1 version of events and not the actual plannings and they thought the shooting was meant to happen on the Isle of the Dead…
How quick did they have the new 1993 legislation written and put in effect too?!
Absolute tinfoil hat bullshit.
Most guns that are sold are right handed.
That point is irrelevant.
It wasn’t a false flag, it was an intelligent response to the stupidity of allowing everyone to buy guns.
I am all for freedom of owning weapons but what the fuck have americans done with their freedom? You’re being ruled by pedophile wannabe emperor, and 50% of the voters voted for him, rights being taken every day and whistleblowers being dissapeared.
I didn’t know until recently that the Christchurch incident in New Zealand spurred the same outcome.
One great thing John Howard acted on.
And absolute bullshit / farrk owf!
„There’s the military-level precision of a gunman“
This point is a little less suspect when you remember that a lot people were sitting down. Sitting down, you’re head is more or less at waist level of someone standing up so if the guns is a waist level then it’s you know, more or less level with someone’s head. Remember, most of the victims were shot in a small café and a small gift store. Hitting a head size target not even 10 metres away from you is not military marksmanship.
„He was a left hander, gunman was reported by witnesses as right handed.“
That’s because it’s easier to use the AR-15 SP1, the main gun used, right handed even if you’re left. The reason is the SP1 does not have a brass deflector to make sure that the hot brass casings get ejected away from your body. The SP1 elects from the right so you’ll have you’re face quote close to the ejection port. If you’re shooting left handed a gun that has no deflector then is is a good chance of getting hit in the teeth a chunk of hot metal so it’s actually better to shoot right handed even if you’re left handed.
Lot of shill comments here today. Sheesh.
Right handed vs Left Handed shooters:
The shooter that shot the victims in the Broad Arrow Cafe shot right handed, and from the hip.
Meaning he did not take aim down the sights. This is incredibly difficult for someone to do,
especially someone with no military or tactical experience.
“Eighteen of the first twenty dead in the Broad Arrow Cafe died from single shots to the head, all fired by the marksman from his right hip in less than 90 seconds”, as described by Prosecutor Damian Bugg.
“The gunman was right-handed and held the rifle about 3 inches above the hip whilst shooting.”
-Graham Collyer – Port Arthur Massacre Survivor Recount
[http://archive.is/dWcV6 ]
[https://web.archive.org/web/20010508013225/http://www.shootersnews.addr.com/cttranscript.htm ]
Excerpts from the transcript of interviews between detectives and Martin Bryant:
DETECTIVE: When you practiced your shooting, did you, where did you hold the gun?
MARTIN BRYANT: Up like this, on my left
DETECTIVE: So if you held a gun, you would pull the trigger with your a finger on your left
hand?
MARTIN BRYANT: Yeah that’s right, yeah
DETECTIVE: Oh right. And uh, did you ever practice shooting from the hip?
MARTIN BRYANT: No, never
DETECTIVE: Never?
[https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Martin_Bryant_complete_interview ],
[https://au.news.yahoo.com/transcript-martin-bryant-31053724.html ]
I’m a righty that shoots rifles lefty for some reason. I’ve met a few others
Whether you think this is a false flag or not, Americans should at least understand that gun culture and ownership in Australia never was, and never has been, anything like it is in the US.
If you think taking guns off the Australian public is in any way comparable in scope and undertaking to taking them off the US public, then you’re mistaken.
The vast majority didn’t give a shit precisely because they didn’t own guns anyway.
Protecting ourselves from a tyrannical government by bearing arms has just never been part of the main stream Australian culture.
This case is one of the most intriguing for me.
I am not from Australia but it almost seems as if the story has been completely shut down. No real documentary’s or information comes out about it. Maybe that’s the best way to deal with these type of tragedy’s.
I understand it was a huge mental scar for the whole country to deal with, but there are some real questions that I definitely feel needed answering surrounding the case, that never seem to get pushed. It’s like the government got their man, case closed, move on.
From all of the information on the case I have read and watched, the main thing that really stands out in this one is the sheer volume of victims and head shots, also the amount of different crime locations, and the perpetrator themselves.
35 killed 23 wounded (first 20 victims with 29 bullets) that’s ruthless efficiency. In most other similar incidents you expect more wounded than killed. A large portion of these were headshots and in a very small amount of time. If it was Bryant then we have to accept that he is an extremely high level shooter.
He committed the murders at seascape
He then committed murders at the cafe
And then at the gift shop
The car park and coaches
The carjacking and toll booth murders
Service station murders and abduction
Back to seascape and the roadway before capture
This is an incredibly complex set of individual crime scenes almost as separate massacres. I can’t think of another case with this many complicated scenes and this amount of victims. The only real comparable one is the Hungerford Massacre. Another bizarre fact is that in most of these type of cases the perpetrator commits suicide at the end but Bryant didn’t.
Then we come to Bryant himself. One of the most bizarre perpetrators of all time. A mentally challenged bizarre eccentric person, incredibly wealthy and with long blonde hair and a bright yellow Volvo. All of a sudden in broad daylight decides to do this crime. Is it possible? Yes. Is it likely? Maybe. Is it like anything else? No.
A fascinating and unique case with many questions that remain unanswered and nobody can talk to Bryant or re investigate any of it