Share.

    26 Kommentare

    1. No-Mushroom5934 on

      Scaramucci’s point on the timing is spot‑on — dropping the ‘no client list, no foul’ memo late on a holiday weekend feels engineered to bury it. Combine that with missing surveillance footage and distracted guards, and yeah, it doesn’t exactly pass the smell test. At a minimum, we deserve real transparency on Epstein‑related files — not another fox‑guarding‑the‑henhouse memo.

    2. Aregisteredusername on

      I am enjoying that this is a topic across such a variety of subs. I hope it leads to something but doubt it.

    3. Hilarious that Trump fans believe he’s not involved (despite the evidence), so they don’t understand why the details aren’t released.

    4. TheRedheadedMonster on

      > “I don’t want to be that guy,” he said. “I’m not [FBI Director Dan] Bongino where I’m speaking into a microphone declaring that he has a client list and he’s a total scumbag, and then I get an important role and then I declare he’s not. I don’t know the answer. I’m not privy enough to the information. So I’m not saying Trump is implicated or not.”

      The problem with Scaramucci is he’s the opposite.

    5. Then_Check7192 on

      Now you really know what all of those donations were for at his inauguration

    6. 2026 DEM house should run Benghazi-like 10 hearings nonstop for 2yrs. They won’t, but they should.

    7. Thin-Competition3018 on

      Remember all the fanfare about „her emails“, well, I need to see the same interest in „the list“. A lot of amazing smoke and mirror treatment from people that do not perform magic well and govern even more poorly.

    8. The whole things feels a lot like when the dog catches the car, and the car in scenario is the records proving the dog is a pedophile.

    9. 128-NotePolyVA on

      The mooch knows a rotten fish when it stinks.

      Once again, there are too many rich and powerful people on this list to make public. Can you imagine the problems it would cause for law enforcement, the country and this POTUS if this would become public?

    10. Stillwater215 on

      My take is that they tried to cut Trump out of the documents, but was so involved that it was impossible to cover up his involvement. So they did the next best thing which was to just deny they exist.

    11. FuriousAlbino on

      Well hearing that from scaramucci is interesting, but what does Ja Rule have to say?

    12. MagicianHeavy001 on

      It’s really simple. If the world is calling the President a pedo, any sane President would release every single file they had on Epstein to clear their name. Unless, of course…they’re in those files as a pedo.

    13. Trump voters *have to* not believe he was involved, because believing he was involved means they put their stamp of approval on child molestation.

    14. vanillafudgenut on

      They could live stream him molesting children non stop and republicans would do NOTHING.

      I dont understand what the point of this is. All the “talk” of republicans looking into epstein or trump or any of this shit is just made up. They really dont care.

      Why are we so enthralled with this “they finally figured it out!” fantasy? They will NEVER, EVER turn on trump. Im so sick of these false hope headlines.

    15. TheRealTinfoil666 on

      This feels like they are prepping the Big Push to activate the 25th Amendment Crisis Plan to replace Dementia Don with the Couch-lover

      The problem is that the band of clueless idiots that were chosen to populate the Cabinet are collectively too clueless and cowed to carry it out. They are too busy shoving each other out of line to kiss Dear Leader’s ass to organize it.

    16. >There is no „Epstein list“

      Yeah, people gift $80 million dollar New York townhomes to one another all the time; clearly there was no blackmail involved.

    Leave A Reply