Donald Trump hat Richter des Obersten Gerichtshofs auf „Speed ​​Dial“, sagt Sotomayor

From Linked article.

In a dissent of a [Supreme Court](https://www.newsweek.com/topic/supreme-court) ruling, Supreme Court Justice [Sonia Sotomayor](https://www.newsweek.com/topic/sonia-sotomayor) said: „Today’s order clarifies only one thing: Other litigants must follow the rules, but the administration has the Supreme Court on speed dial.“

Justice Sotomayor made this statement in her dissent from the ruling allowing for migrants to be deported to countries they are not from.

In her dissent, which she wrote with Justice [Ketanji Brown Jackson](https://www.newsweek.com/topic/ketanji-brown-jackson), she said that this would result in the government „deporting noncitizens to potentially dangerous countries without notice or the opportunity to assert a fear of torture.“

Sotomayor and Jackson levied other criticisms at the Trump administration and the conservative-leaning court in their dissent, saying, „Today’s order not only excuses (once again) the Government’s undisguised contempt for the Judiciary; it also leaves the District Court without any guidance about how this litigation should proceed.

„The United States may not deport noncitizens to a country where they are likely to be tortured or killed. International and domestic law guarantee that basic human right. In this case, the Government seeks to nullify it by deporting noncitizens to potentially dangerous countries without notice or the opportunity to assert a fear of torture. Because the Fifth Amendment, immigration law, federal regulations, and this Court’s precedent unambiguously prohibit such no-notice deportations, a Federal District Court issued a classwide preliminary injunction barring the Government from removing noncitizens without notice and adequate process.“

How is deporting people to another country they have never lived in count  neither as cruel nor unusual? 

did you see how he was talking to Roberts at the state of the union? told me all I needed to know

There is no God, FACT.

Any particular reason why she or any of the other non-compromised justices can’t whistle blow the others in regard to their obvious corruption?

The king of the Morons regularly prays with them via conference calls.

Speed dial doesn’t exists, it’s literally a tap in your phone. What are these people, way past retirement? Oh.

Don’t answer the phone.

What I’ll never understand is how there’s so many otherwise power-hungry bottomfeeders who seem to be completely content just being Trump’s little bitch when I would’ve expected them to have a bigger ego than that.

The base principle of this notion… a person in a role of power but not in the world of courts, regularly contacts judges to give his opinion on legal cases… how is this anywhere close to legal either for the judge or for the influencer?

As a judge, discussing a legal case with an outsider who actively has a vested interest in how a judge decides a case, seems like a huge ethics and legal violation. What’s the difference between the president “strongly suggesting” a specific outcome for a case as compared to a financial donor giving a judge free trips, paying for a mortgage for the judge’s mother, or any kind of thing that you might see as a potential prize in the Price is Right Showcase Showdown? You win a free trip to Spain, and a new Winnebago!!

Speed dial? Everyone in government is living in a bygone era. Let’s at least cap the age requirement at the retirement age.