Mate, I sense that it may mean a lot to you, but Armenian and Azerbaijani beefs or the ethnic cleansings done by the both isn’t really relevant to Cyprus. Tatar may visit moon when looking for support, but that’s about that.
Phrases like ‚occupied Stepanakert‘ being used next to ‚unrecognised‘ is also pretty inconsistent for starters.
Ionoculo on
Ersin Tatar, head of evil colony recognised by no one and it’s terrible regime where they dont even exist in world maps and the galaxy, arrives in occupied Stepanakert.
notnotnotnotgolifa on
There is no north of Cyprus!!
kurtdonaldcobain27 on
What a gaymenian propaganda lmao
Salt_Lynx270 on
>unrecognised regime
>occupied Stepanakert
???da fuc???
FlashyDiscount752 on
I had a good laugh thanks to you
Worried-Antelope6000 on
He is not head of a colony, what a stupid statement…
[deleted] on
[removed]
Mercury599 on
Since Armenia recognises Stepanakert as Azerbaijani, how can it be occupied?
Due-Statistician8694 on
I can smell them from here!!
Helpful-Novel-914 on
This literally means nothing. When push comes to shove with Turkey in a potential conflict in the are, everyone is turning against sultan Erdogan. Israel and Azerbaijan will not care for Turkeys opinion and Greece and Cyprus will cut the “trying to work things out” vibe, joining Kurds and Armenians in the area😍😍😍
DepartureStreet2903 on
I lived in Girne area for two years, in Ozankoy in particular. One morning I went to have my coffee and Mr. Tatar was walking around with his dog, we”ve had a coffee together and I even took a photo…lets see if I can find it…
He is a very good man. I wish him well and to KKTC as well. I still have my good friends there.
HunterM567 on
How is Stepanakert occupied when it’s internationally recognised as a part of Azerbaijan?
Brilliant-Figure-149 on
We had him visiting the UK a few days ago. Have to say he got a very easy ride in the interview that I watched (on TalkTV). The interviewer was coming out with all kinds of cobblers like the ROC is „owned by Greece“ and countless mentions of „the north of“ and „the south of“ Cyprus.
oocalan on
The definitions in the title are contradicting. I would be fine with it if they were consistent.
Ele_Bele on
Referring to Khankendi as „occupied“ ignores the fact that the region in question – Khankendi (formerly Soviet name: Stepanakert) – lies within the internationally recognized territory of Azerbaijan, as affirmed by multiple UN Security Council resolutions (e.g., 822, 853, 874, 884). The so-called „Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh“ was an unrecognized separatist entity, and its disbanding in 2023 marked the restoration of Azerbaijan’s full sovereignty.
Calling President Ilham Aliyev a „dictator“ is a personal political opinion, not a factual description. Regardless of one’s view on his governance, Azerbaijan is a sovereign UN member state, and labeling its president in this way adds nothing constructive to the discussion.
dogan12345 on
Brother I know you want to stick it to turkey by saying occupied stepanakert or supporting armenia without question just because armenia and turkey have bad relations but this isnt a sound argument. Everyone can see that you are biased and it hurts your own cause.
Enough_Home_1757 on
North of Cyprus? Unless you meant Turkey – which I don’t think you did – it’s “occupied” Cyprus.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
18 Kommentare
Mate, I sense that it may mean a lot to you, but Armenian and Azerbaijani beefs or the ethnic cleansings done by the both isn’t really relevant to Cyprus. Tatar may visit moon when looking for support, but that’s about that.
Phrases like ‚occupied Stepanakert‘ being used next to ‚unrecognised‘ is also pretty inconsistent for starters.
Ersin Tatar, head of evil colony recognised by no one and it’s terrible regime where they dont even exist in world maps and the galaxy, arrives in occupied Stepanakert.
There is no north of Cyprus!!
What a gaymenian propaganda lmao
>unrecognised regime
>occupied Stepanakert
???da fuc???
I had a good laugh thanks to you
He is not head of a colony, what a stupid statement…
[removed]
Since Armenia recognises Stepanakert as Azerbaijani, how can it be occupied?
I can smell them from here!!
This literally means nothing. When push comes to shove with Turkey in a potential conflict in the are, everyone is turning against sultan Erdogan. Israel and Azerbaijan will not care for Turkeys opinion and Greece and Cyprus will cut the “trying to work things out” vibe, joining Kurds and Armenians in the area😍😍😍
I lived in Girne area for two years, in Ozankoy in particular. One morning I went to have my coffee and Mr. Tatar was walking around with his dog, we”ve had a coffee together and I even took a photo…lets see if I can find it…
https://preview.redd.it/82t0t4924uaf1.jpeg?width=721&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dba3172ff2ba8e94d5a501ce56202a79c6d93ab6
He is a very good man. I wish him well and to KKTC as well. I still have my good friends there.
How is Stepanakert occupied when it’s internationally recognised as a part of Azerbaijan?
We had him visiting the UK a few days ago. Have to say he got a very easy ride in the interview that I watched (on TalkTV). The interviewer was coming out with all kinds of cobblers like the ROC is „owned by Greece“ and countless mentions of „the north of“ and „the south of“ Cyprus.
The definitions in the title are contradicting. I would be fine with it if they were consistent.
Referring to Khankendi as „occupied“ ignores the fact that the region in question – Khankendi (formerly Soviet name: Stepanakert) – lies within the internationally recognized territory of Azerbaijan, as affirmed by multiple UN Security Council resolutions (e.g., 822, 853, 874, 884). The so-called „Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh“ was an unrecognized separatist entity, and its disbanding in 2023 marked the restoration of Azerbaijan’s full sovereignty.
Calling President Ilham Aliyev a „dictator“ is a personal political opinion, not a factual description. Regardless of one’s view on his governance, Azerbaijan is a sovereign UN member state, and labeling its president in this way adds nothing constructive to the discussion.
Brother I know you want to stick it to turkey by saying occupied stepanakert or supporting armenia without question just because armenia and turkey have bad relations but this isnt a sound argument. Everyone can see that you are biased and it hurts your own cause.
North of Cyprus? Unless you meant Turkey – which I don’t think you did – it’s “occupied” Cyprus.