Drei Gruppen, die verboten sind
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/three-groups-to-be-proscribed
Von Anony_mouse202
Drei Gruppen, die verboten sind
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/three-groups-to-be-proscribed
Von Anony_mouse202
15 Kommentare
[removed]
Great news. Shame about the usual suspects coming out and voting against these moves, but the country is definitely a safer place for this.
[removed]
[removed]
Maniacs Murder Cult does sound like the sort of thing that should be proscribed
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
Spray painting some planes now officially puts you on the same level as Boko Haram.
Wonderful.
I’m sure that these continuous crackdowns on peaceful protest will not end up having any negative effects that the government has refused to consider.
I wonder if people would be as quick to support Russian Action, if they went about telling the UK government they should not support Ukraine all the while sabotaging UK military assets, UK Defence companies and assaulting police officers and security guards with sledgehammers and axes.
remarkably scummy from to roll all 3 into 1 order. So any MP that opposes PA being classed as a terror group gets instantly smeared as „well they voted against neonazis being proscribed“.
Even if you dont like PA; this is a bad sign for our civil liberties. Labour fawns over the memory of suffragettes and miners who both took much more extreme action.
Not even say that at least one of the planes painted is back in service. So the impact is fairly neglible. Its not even a plane owned by the RAF for christ sake; for some reason we have our military logisitcs in a PFI. Its a far cry from the swathes of folk saying that it was permanent damage and that protestors armed with a scooter and spraypaint should be executed.
I’m in full support of proscribing Palestine Action:
1) Not committed to non-violence, say things like “no action can go too far”. Have committed acts of violence against the person.
2) Terrorist emulating website “form a cell, evade the police, attack targets etc.” They clearly try hard to emulate terrorists for whatever reason.
3) Foreign influence nightmare, produces unverifiable list of targets that then get attacked, created by utterly unknown and unaccountable people. Completely unknown funding.
4) Attacks civil society e.g. lawyers who sought an injunction against Palestine action.
5) Attacks national security, we surely all know that one.
It’s basically all terror/fifth column cosplay until it’s serious and point 5 is probably a suitable place to draw the line before they killed someone, which I truly believe they would have done.
Never heard of the other two. Are they putting them on to pad out the ban a bit ?