Überlebende von Torontos Danforth Shooting bekommen ein grünes Licht auf die Klage gegen die Schütze
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/appeal-court-certifies-lawsuit-danforth-mass-shooting-1.7568788
Überlebende von Torontos Danforth Shooting bekommen ein grünes Licht auf die Klage gegen die Schütze
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/appeal-court-certifies-lawsuit-danforth-mass-shooting-1.7568788
7 Kommentare
Very unorthodox ruling from the appeal judge. The motions judge was correct: establishing a class based off of a random act has always been grounds to dismiss a class action. A bad precedent being set by the appeal judge.
“Some of the survivors and their families brought a class action against the gunmaker for failing to implement technology that would prevent unauthorized use of the gun, but the claim failed at the certification stage.”
How would they even do this realistically?
If you allow this then you have to allow people to sue Audi for allowing their vehicle to run over people at the Lapu-Lapu festival.
I assume this is just a Judge wanting to make a name for themselves or they have some weird bias that they are inserting into this decision… Any lawyer attached to this is just looking to make money from the time spent doing something they know is improbable.
This is dumb. So any car accident – could we not just sue the car maker for not implementing a „never get in car accident“ technology?
What about if someone uses a bat to hit you on the head? Sue bat makers for allowing such a thing to be possible
Let me get this right a person gets a gun illegally, that has been illegally smuggled into the country,uses it to commit murder (which is illegal) and somehow it is S&W fault for not implementing a technology that has not ever been little more than a pipedream
Our courts rejected even looking at the case of our federal government denying citizens any travel on planes and trains due to their vaccination status, but this nonsense sails right through appeals.