Lesen Sie einfach und erstaunlicher Artikel über RTL. 40% + der öffentlichen Mitarbeiter verdienen mehr als 10.000 pro Monat, während ein Fith der Bevölkerung Leben ist oder von Armut bedroht ist.
Ich bin kein Mann aus Links, die Einkommensungleichheit ist gut, wenn marktorientierte und menschliche Fähigkeiten effizient zugewiesen werden. Diese Ungleichheit ist jedoch nicht marktgetreu, sie ist Politik, die von Stimmen und schwerem GateKept angetrieben wird. Und wird wirklich starke Konsequenzen haben, wenn diese Menschen in den Ruhestand gehen. Als Steuerzahler bin ich besorgt und bis zu irgendwann angewidert.
Was denken Sie
Als Referenz
Wealth and Income inequality, the hypocrisy of this country.
byu/SunSpecialist5925 inLuxembourg
Von SunSpecialist5925
8 Kommentare
Don’t be a hater, get yourself one of those jobs
https://govjobs.public.lu/fr.html
You know that they pay their share into the retirement fund on these incomes right? It’s not the people who work for the government and then retire that are the problem. It is the lack of accountability and performance monitoring with real life consequences in case of underperformance. Plus the waste that isn’t even visible like in our building the heating works all year, there is a boiler that heats up 200 Liters of water to 60 degrees all year and nobody uses this hot water. Printing everything in color because why not? The little things. Everywhere.
This is gross or net?
As long as parties kneel to the CGFP, nothing will change.
Every party is in fear of them, especially when they threaten with strikes.
We just need a politician with balls to let it happen when they don’t get what they want.
One of the reason I’m moving my business to another country.
Imagine working hard to earn 7 figures… and giving away half of it. Including to those people.
Income inequality is good when market driven?
So… it’s cool when a fifth of a country lives in poverty as long as it’s because the good old market does its thing?
This discussion is brought forward every now and then to get people riled up.
10k is for 20 years of service and depends on the persons situation, like kids and other bonuses.
Yes, it isn’t performance driven, there is no performance to be had, it’s a service. One where it is difficult to be corrupt in, as salaries are high and your boss can’t force you to do something illegal by holding a raise or your job over your head. If people want to know what happens if a public service is made private can easily check our postal service, that’s becoming worse every year or germany’s public transport.
What irks me most, people are crying out as if lowering the public sector’s pay will give them themselves a raise. More like the opposite, as there would be less spending money around.
What’s pissing me off most is that kind of envy is voluntarily pushed, but not everyone working in the public sector is immediately well off but gets still told he’s at fault. I mean, a civil servant’s wage is no longer a guarantee to get a loan to buy a place to live in anymore, especially as wages need to build up while prices are doing the same at a faster pace.
The problem is not the salary. The problem is the low productivity in some public institutions. In some places people arrive at 7.00 to clock in and drink coffee until 10.00 without doing any work. Then its almost lunch time and they start contacting their lunch buddies to agree where to go for lunch. Soon its 15h. Time to leave or maybe just do 1 or 2h of paid overtime.
Its criminal.