Share.

    12 Kommentare

    1. sedatedlife on

      Like it matters rules are not laws and Republicans will have no issue ignoring the parliamentarian.

    2. Blablablaballs on

      Maybe if he puts on more powder he can wait two weeks and it’ll work out. 

    3. *“The Parliamentarian has made clear that Senate Republicans cannot use their partisan budget to shift major nutrition assistance costs to the states that would have inevitably led to major cuts,” she said.*

      Yeah, forcing the states to cut back on their SNAP programs. Although the work rule may still stand.

    4. D-MAN-FLORIDA on

      What are the odds the either:

      1. Ignore the parliamentarian and pass it anyway

      2. Change the rules so it could still be in the bill

      3. Create a separate bill whose purpose is to cut SNAP benefits

    5. dancefan2019 on

      Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark., said in a statement that his team is examining options that would comply with Senate rules to achieve savings and „to ensure SNAP serves those who truly need it while **being responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars.”**

      I have to laugh. All the taxpayer funds being wasted on $45 m parades, building a ballroom at the White House while tearing out the rose garden, all the money spent on ICE who terrorize our communities, and then tax cuts to the wealthy. But let’s be sure to save taxpayer dollars by taking food away from poor people. /s

    6. I mean, they’ve been ignoring the Parliamentarian over and over, at this point this feels more like they’re pretending to pay attention so they can claim the Parliamentarian suddenly matters when Democrats try to pass something.

    7. Vivid_Dot2869 on

      I wonder if there’s any areas where Dems can prevail on an amendment. Maybe for instance Lee’s land sale, or if Hawley holds his position on Medicaid.

    8. The American taxpayers have stooped to the role of a pathetic cuck with tears in their eyes begging for him to stop.

    Leave A Reply