Submission statement: This article offers a rare insider critique of Palantir Technologies The piece explores how Pinto’s initial enthusiasm for Palantir gave way to alarm as he witnessed the company’s expanding influence over state surveillance infrastructure and its alignment with militarized governance—both domestically and abroad.
He draws attention to Palantir’s use of artificial intelligence and ISTAR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition, and Reconnaissance) technologies to support military operations in conflict zones such as Gaza and Ukraine, and voices concern about similar tools being deployed for immigration enforcement and protest monitoring within the U.S.
It calls into question the ethical boundaries of tech deployment, the normalization of military-industrial values in software design, and the erosion of public sector independence under the guise of “efficiency” and national security.
Pinto’s journey illustrates how proximity to power can foster both complicity and the potential for resistance.
Sexy_Kumquat on
I was an early investor – sold everything when it became clear what they were about.
Can’t support how this tech is being used in the YS and overseas today – this is straight out of a George Orwell book…
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
2 Kommentare
Submission statement: This article offers a rare insider critique of Palantir Technologies The piece explores how Pinto’s initial enthusiasm for Palantir gave way to alarm as he witnessed the company’s expanding influence over state surveillance infrastructure and its alignment with militarized governance—both domestically and abroad.
He draws attention to Palantir’s use of artificial intelligence and ISTAR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition, and Reconnaissance) technologies to support military operations in conflict zones such as Gaza and Ukraine, and voices concern about similar tools being deployed for immigration enforcement and protest monitoring within the U.S.
It calls into question the ethical boundaries of tech deployment, the normalization of military-industrial values in software design, and the erosion of public sector independence under the guise of “efficiency” and national security.
Pinto’s journey illustrates how proximity to power can foster both complicity and the potential for resistance.
I was an early investor – sold everything when it became clear what they were about.
Can’t support how this tech is being used in the YS and overseas today – this is straight out of a George Orwell book…