The man was deported to an El Salvadorian death camp, with out due process, and it took the supreme court to rule 9-0 to bring him back, and now the Trump administration is trying to get the entire court case thrown out with out first completing the discovery process, so that this man has no evidence to be used in a civil defense case.
travio on
Given how much they pissed off the judge, I don’t think he will agree to this.
Long-Rooster-9641 on
TACO scared of a little discovery.
mwaford on
Not his decision!
literallytwisted on
„No Discovery!“ „Need to discovery sleepy Joe!“ „Also no torture in El Salvador prison!“ „No burn pits!“ „Thank you for your attention to this matter“ = Probably Trump.
[deleted] on
[deleted]
menagerath on
Pam Bondi is going to need a bigger cross.
fotofiend on
Ah the old “we fucked up so bad and are going to be sued into oblivion so we just want to skip the whole discovery part” defense.
One_Olive_8933 on
This is wild. All the people in support of having him sent to El Salvador should be absolutely pissed that the DOJ isn’t “protecting” Americans from criminals. Because, remember, he part of a large criminal organization that traffic’s people in the US… right?!?!?Maybe, and Im not betting on it, but maybe they’ll see this for what it is…
All us normal people see this for what it is.
No-Document-8970 on
They want it dismissed because they know they’re cooked.
Nhak84 on
I say this as an experienced litigator: these lawyers should be disbarred. These sorts of tactics are intended to thwart the system the lawyers swore an oath to uphold. This goes beyond zealous advocacy into the realm of undermining justice. It has bothered me my entire career. They should not be allowed to practice law. Part of our duty is to advise our clients that they can’t always do or get what they want, understanding that the system of justice is bigger than any one person. Tearing it down for a client or money or power or just to feel better than someone else is antithetical to what we swore to do.
popotheclowns on
I hate these headlines.
The case against him is ongoing.
They want to dismiss the case against the government in their handling of getting him back.
Right?
EccentricFan on
I actually think this might be exactly why the brought him back. Someone figured they could use this argument to avoid discovery in the case and avoid embarrassing facts coming to light.
Total-Mushroom-9614 on
Trump Lawyer: “I mean….whoopsies?
🤷🤷
Whoopsie DAISIES???”
wytewydow on
What a weasel. Just an absolute slimeball. You people admire him?
coulls on
Whilst it doesn’t help right now, people will be poring over this for hundreds of years. This dark period of US history will have the lamp of decency shone upon it.
utlayolisdi on
Of course he wants it dismissed because discovery will reveal the lies.
krom0025 on
Then Garcia needs to sue the government for violations of constitutional rights. If he does, the discovery will happen.
mikeholczer on
> Defendants have taken extraordinary steps and have facilitated, and indeed effectuated, Abrego Garcia’s return to the United States
They did do a lot of extraordinary things, like bring in a foreign dictator to mock the idea of releasing him.
lilchocochip on
Can Pam Bondi be disbarred now?
SellsNothing on
TRUMP ADMIN DEFIES THE 14TH AMENDMENT BY DENYING ABREGO GARCIA DUE PROCESS, ILLEGALLY BREAKING THEIR OATH TO THE CONSTITUTION
That should be the headline. We need to call out this administration every time they break their oath
VRGIMP27 on
In other words the administration was full of shit and they don’t want it proved.
obligatorythr0waway on
They brought him home because they thought they could bury the discovery?
lol
Adventurous_Rope4711 on
Real question, can Garcia sue for libel against an administration oficial that is saying he is a gang member, trafficker, drug dealer? Assuming he is not of course?
ZogemWho on
Never mind.. nothing to see here.. no need to subpoena emails/texts/related documents.. seriously, we’re good.
nwgdad on
> The Justice Department on Monday formally filed a motion to dismiss the case on mootness grounds, asserting that Abrego Garcia’s presence in the country means **the critical issue in this case was resolved.**
Far from it. The critical issue here is that the TACO regime has and continues to consistently trample on the Constitutional rights of the people.
cleowifeyy6 on
Wow, that’s sketchy.
Crystaldaddy on
And there are so many more than just this one man!! Andry Hernandez Romero . I hate they are just forgotten
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
28 Kommentare
The man was deported to an El Salvadorian death camp, with out due process, and it took the supreme court to rule 9-0 to bring him back, and now the Trump administration is trying to get the entire court case thrown out with out first completing the discovery process, so that this man has no evidence to be used in a civil defense case.
Given how much they pissed off the judge, I don’t think he will agree to this.
TACO scared of a little discovery.
Not his decision!
„No Discovery!“ „Need to discovery sleepy Joe!“ „Also no torture in El Salvador prison!“ „No burn pits!“ „Thank you for your attention to this matter“ = Probably Trump.
[deleted]
Pam Bondi is going to need a bigger cross.
Ah the old “we fucked up so bad and are going to be sued into oblivion so we just want to skip the whole discovery part” defense.
This is wild. All the people in support of having him sent to El Salvador should be absolutely pissed that the DOJ isn’t “protecting” Americans from criminals. Because, remember, he part of a large criminal organization that traffic’s people in the US… right?!?!?Maybe, and Im not betting on it, but maybe they’ll see this for what it is…
All us normal people see this for what it is.
They want it dismissed because they know they’re cooked.
I say this as an experienced litigator: these lawyers should be disbarred. These sorts of tactics are intended to thwart the system the lawyers swore an oath to uphold. This goes beyond zealous advocacy into the realm of undermining justice. It has bothered me my entire career. They should not be allowed to practice law. Part of our duty is to advise our clients that they can’t always do or get what they want, understanding that the system of justice is bigger than any one person. Tearing it down for a client or money or power or just to feel better than someone else is antithetical to what we swore to do.
I hate these headlines.
The case against him is ongoing.
They want to dismiss the case against the government in their handling of getting him back.
Right?
I actually think this might be exactly why the brought him back. Someone figured they could use this argument to avoid discovery in the case and avoid embarrassing facts coming to light.
Trump Lawyer: “I mean….whoopsies?
🤷🤷
Whoopsie DAISIES???”
What a weasel. Just an absolute slimeball. You people admire him?
Whilst it doesn’t help right now, people will be poring over this for hundreds of years. This dark period of US history will have the lamp of decency shone upon it.
Of course he wants it dismissed because discovery will reveal the lies.
Then Garcia needs to sue the government for violations of constitutional rights. If he does, the discovery will happen.
> Defendants have taken extraordinary steps and have facilitated, and indeed effectuated, Abrego Garcia’s return to the United States
They did do a lot of extraordinary things, like bring in a foreign dictator to mock the idea of releasing him.
Can Pam Bondi be disbarred now?
TRUMP ADMIN DEFIES THE 14TH AMENDMENT BY DENYING ABREGO GARCIA DUE PROCESS, ILLEGALLY BREAKING THEIR OATH TO THE CONSTITUTION
That should be the headline. We need to call out this administration every time they break their oath
In other words the administration was full of shit and they don’t want it proved.
They brought him home because they thought they could bury the discovery?
lol
Real question, can Garcia sue for libel against an administration oficial that is saying he is a gang member, trafficker, drug dealer? Assuming he is not of course?
Never mind.. nothing to see here.. no need to subpoena emails/texts/related documents.. seriously, we’re good.
> The Justice Department on Monday formally filed a motion to dismiss the case on mootness grounds, asserting that Abrego Garcia’s presence in the country means **the critical issue in this case was resolved.**
Far from it. The critical issue here is that the TACO regime has and continues to consistently trample on the Constitutional rights of the people.
Wow, that’s sketchy.
And there are so many more than just this one man!! Andry Hernandez Romero . I hate they are just forgotten