Was denkst du darüber? Ich lese sie derzeit immer noch durch und tbh ist es schrecklich. Ich denke, es hat irgendwie mehr Nachteile als Vorteile für uns:
● Dynamische Annahme von Gesetzen: Die Schweiz muss so schnell wie möglich neu erlassene EU-Gesetze verabschieden ● Im Falle von Streitigkeiten werden internationale Schiedsgerichtsgerichte entscheiden.
Dann gibt es auch den Kohäsionsbeitrag von 350 mio. CHF pro Jahr zur EU.
Ich denke, vor allem wegen dieser Punkte ist es ein Verlust der nationalen Autonomie für die Schweiz. Insbesondere durch hohe Kosten ohne große Rechte in der EU (wie Stimmrechte für neue Rechtsbereitschaft in der EU). Es verstößt gegen die (halbe) direkte Demokratie der Schweiz Imho.
https://www.srf.ch/news/schweiz/schweiz-eu-die-eu-vertraege-sind-publiziert-das-muessen-sie-wissen
Von clapalienbuttcheek
9 Kommentare
I share your worries, but I wonder about specifics. We already are influenced from the outside and it wasn’t always bad. Women suffrage is a direct result from an international treaty. European courts would force our government to do more for the environment, same with corporate international responsibility our neighbors are more advanced.
Sure, the EU is neoliberal, but we’re stuck with a conservative government that thinks we’re some kind of island instead of the dead center of Europe hosting tons of important international actors.
At this point I can’t say what’s better…
https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss-politics/the-swiss-eu-bilateral-treaty-updates-explained/88790104
An article in English with a bit of background
The forced adoptation of EU laws and the endorsed sanctions upon failure to do so alone means it will fail, not even mentionioning all the rest.
The swiss tend to be somewhat fond of democracy and since that goes against the current EUs design I see little chance of such treaties succeeding for now.
Regarding ‚Compensatory measures‘ in the case of non-compliance
> Die Massnahmen dürfen nur im Bereich der Binnenmarktabkommen greifen und müssen verhältnismässig sein.
I mean…that sounds better than what we have today where the EU can leverage anything and everything against us (remember the Horizon or the stock market equivalency farce?)
As for it going against the (half) direct democracy of Switzerland:
When we voted on bilateral agreements it was always: either adopt the changes or the whole thing comes crashing down (guillotine clause). Now it’s much more nuanced, which seems like big progress to me.
I believe this will be ripped apart when we vote on it. I think the main issues are around the „Dynamic adoption of legislation“ as well as the unspecified 14 measurements about the wages.
Swiss voters aren’t willing to accept anything that could interfere with their political rights. Wage dumping could become an issue (already is in certain parts of the country).
I don’t know what would be a proper solution, we need the EU, they need us (before anybody comes in here crying they don’t: North / South route, our participation in various projects and such).
Additionally a huge problem on this will be our participation during votes. Around 60% of those having the right do not vote.
Will fail.
but most likely the Grenzschutz, Kompass – and Neutralitätsinitiative will get through.
almost everyone can find something that’s a dealbreaker for them. unless the federal council delivers a communication / storytelling miracle, it will fail to go through even without the ständemehr
I have the solution.
It’s time to join.
Not for Switzerland to join the EU.
The EU can join Switzerland and form new cantons.
I will take no questions.
Considering state of EU it would be more logical to have dynamic laws for EU to adopt.