Seems like one of those dubious „fact checking“ segments back from 2016 which selectively interprets data to dispel „myths“. The entire source of the article is a questionable Abacus poll, the numbers of which were not in line with other pollsters. The results of the poll also do not line up with the type of results we saw in the election, which showed a strong dislike of Poilievre, combined with a general distrust of the Liberal party.
Like, Coletto claims Poilievre had a positive approval rating before the election, which simply cannot be true. A leader with a positive approval rating isn’t losing Carleton.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
1 Kommentar
Seems like one of those dubious „fact checking“ segments back from 2016 which selectively interprets data to dispel „myths“. The entire source of the article is a questionable Abacus poll, the numbers of which were not in line with other pollsters. The results of the poll also do not line up with the type of results we saw in the election, which showed a strong dislike of Poilievre, combined with a general distrust of the Liberal party.
Like, Coletto claims Poilievre had a positive approval rating before the election, which simply cannot be true. A leader with a positive approval rating isn’t losing Carleton.