Heute habe ich das neue Weekly Offer -Magazin aus dem Greens Supermarkt erhalten und bemerkte etwas ziemlich unehrliches. Sie werben Garrone Rosso Vermut Als er für 6,95 € zum Verkauf angeboten, betrug der ursprüngliche Preis 9 €. Aber ich habe letzte Woche genau die gleiche Flasche für nur 5,95 € gekauft (siehe meine Quittung).

    Dies ist nicht das erste Mal, dass ich bei Grüns gefälschte Angebote bemerkt habe – sie blasen oft das auf "Originalpreis" Rabatte zu leiten, die größer aussehen als sie tatsächlich sind. Hat noch jemand das mit Grün erlebt?

    Auch erwähnenswert: Ich habe gesehen, wie abgelaufene Produkte zum Verkauf angeboten werden als "Sonderangebote" Mehr als einmal. Es ist wirklich besorgniserregend.

    https://i.redd.it/n0zb25l1ab6f1.jpeg

    Von rklement22

    Share.

    14 Kommentare

    1. poor_decision on

      Next up: water is wet. This happens all across the world, raise the price just to discount it

    2. RebellionTroll on

      But it also shows on the receipt that it was also discounted from €9, so if anything it’s just a lesser discount this week no?

    3. some_-username on

      I don’t know whether you arrived to the right conclusion.

      In your receipt, it still indicates that the original price is €9. Could be that the price was discounted to €5.95 last week and to €6.95 this week. It’s still a discount from €9.00.

    4. It was on discount on your receipt, it’s less on discount now. I don’t understand what the problem is, full price was reported as 9, before and now.

    5. Im not sure what’s the problem here. Base price was 9. it was 9 both in the offer and the receipt. Discounted price in the booklet is 6.95, you paid 5.95. so you are complaining that you paid 1EUR less that what you would have paid next week? or what? Confused because of the heat?

      It clearly states in the booklet that from the period of June 16-26 the price will be 6.95. they have all the right to change it. it’s still discounted the base price is the same not inflated whatsoever.. They must have realized that 5.95 was too cheap but because they already posted that the price was 5.95 then they decided that starting June 16-26 the price will now be 6.95

    6. ResourceWonderful514 on

      Wrong example. It was already on offer last week then.
      Also its standard to sell almost expired Inventory with a large discount in every shop.

    7. When presenting discounts they must either compare to the (second) lowest price within the last 30 days, or to RRP (and make it clear that that’s what they compare to – which they don’t). In a well functioning market supermarkets would actually observe and report each other.

    8. CrowEmbarrassed9133 on

      You could buy some healthy food too. Alcohol, milk, cheddar and coke. Who are you?

    9. Lazy_Cod_1237 on

      For everyone saying it is fine, it shouldn’t be allowed.

      According to EU law, a price reduction claims such as “was € 50, now € 25” can be misleading if the initial selling price (known as “anchor price”) has been inflated. In all EU countries traders are obliged, when offering a discount, to indicate the lowest price applied to the item at least 30 days before the announcement of the price reduction.

      Source: https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/unfair-treatment/unfair-pricing/index_en.htm

    10. liliphant23 on

      Same with lidl. Their additional disc in app does not reflect right when paid.

    11. SteakNeither3751 on

      I have seen this like millions of times. Does it justify it? No. Is there anything we can do to report? Sure there must be something. Do I know where to report? No. Did I just waste your time reading this? Probably…

    Leave A Reply