Share.

    5 Kommentare

    1. Taco carts have caused more deaths than AI. Regulations have historically been reactive, not proactive.

    2. MetaKnowing on

      „When people ask me why I lose sleep over artificial intelligence, I don’t talk about killer robots. My fear is more prosaic: that we will hand over so many decisions to opaque algorithms that we end up no longer controlling our future.

      This “[gradual disempowerment](https://urlwatch.com/urlwatch?b=aHR0cHM6Ly83OTJkNTZlOS5zdHJlYWtsaW5rcy5jb20vQ2JTRFFEN1NVbDlSNmhkMk9BT1czeWF0L2h0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGZ3JhZHVhbC1kaXNlbXBvd2VybWVudC5haSUyRg==&m=j7Uj14IwyDk9hBil6pAcrhhOEZWmRgYSqyjZ8kIZ5HONxUrJ2bWiaviQRsrb2alAwaIVYGRUnAN250AuS33h46cGdE1HIcZmiWGgJcwFdVxDDbnfhJ_91BJcWXYUkh0XdEopSqePoL4OBjw5EUHknnNvw2E5HSuYkiXviNsSR6jraq-LYKHyZeB8YCfIGEVToW7BMvogeUdEjJmkp9CAj1Md-Jvco1eSHPxbA-KrduGGX-K_tn3C9y_ngvTECrUOFQpQPajv0hspHBzU75iRqlmEwpTDaQMVMVhFvg0RvDaHbJwapp_kBTwrpRnvV79z9zJdFcK39NQb4OqXCCM5KaCLw9gGeAIg&s=EzWRtnMpNvt4ItxW&k=AQIDAHioQIyO0eoYoITvmmVWPEd8w8kFgVR_x66Xvs3Hkz-H4QG4YW__rutRd_o3eR9nLLqnAAAAfjB8BgkqhkiG9w0BBwagbzBtAgEAMGgGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQM-IWjaC2zP2BxzZzCAgEQgDuF10iEsIiRAcAR48N5SH-7jp03N4HS_rkzhSR_9rbfqRKF6av0pWRsuDVornvLYK9xocbeQxCU5I8aGg==&bs=isvk1006mlRTS7ODR2KnBGFaH4wH6sEn9b7e9Ehz-y0=&domain=792d56e9.streaklinks.com)” is the default path ahead, if we go on treating AI as less risky than a taco cart.

      The “taco cart” comparison is not a joke: In New York you need a license, a food safety course, and a Department of Health inspection before you can sell a plate of tacos on the sidewalk. Yet any company with enough money and talent can train a powerful AI model capable of drafting legislation, writing malware or optimizing content for addictiveness — without even writing a safety plan.

      The regulatory asymmetry would be comical if it were not so dangerous.

      The truth is, as even the CEOs of AI labs admit, [we are still a long way from understanding how AI systems work](https://www.darioamodei.com/post/the-urgency-of-interpretability) and how to make them safe.

      To their credit, the heads of the leading AI companies acknowledge that their technology could create risks to public safety, including future [existential risks](https://urlwatch.com/urlwatch?b=aHR0cHM6Ly83OTJkNTZlOS5zdHJlYWtsaW5rcy5jb20vQ2JTRFFENzlmVlFpNW4wTVRRdUZMTnhWL2h0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGc2FmZS5haSUyRndvcmslMkZzdGF0ZW1lbnQtb24tYWktcmlzaw==&m=7iCRZrhX2giIYT9Scc3Oi9Khw-iFHphL1iC3NjtQsvxKUNyn0QlwpeovfzaM3yo0UEUtdHN4mg_FmfebxAbjQlddpTry3d9aruzD8pLgSHUbkv_6nydJ3wRgbSNNocZN2mB6yTw2ducSUkyCNMkZVi8pNQBzJMFafyqQ1som4Am1nLtgq9I0nymZ1Y2vDyDAKFxbB5hqbqhF-9gh6_b48E0VcS8YBM5FKIT5p_KAS2X5l2VGp1FrjlMXrQSg1QdQfmSU1wSQqeqU5w_A4X-7wxehI8STVzmrrDeXdJkceFgR7kvQeMMD-aRPQ15xYd9agr_AwwXsCz3-TNUCkQHmBuovSo9PA1IR&s=uUtM5tZB1ulr1Dz6&k=AQIDAHioQIyO0eoYoITvmmVWPEd8w8kFgVR_x66Xvs3Hkz-H4QG4YW__rutRd_o3eR9nLLqnAAAAfjB8BgkqhkiG9w0BBwagbzBtAgEAMGgGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQM-IWjaC2zP2BxzZzCAgEQgDuF10iEsIiRAcAR48N5SH-7jp03N4HS_rkzhSR_9rbfqRKF6av0pWRsuDVornvLYK9xocbeQxCU5I8aGg==&bs=Op2QhT6lEx28xNG0q6aMmp9iRGOdqbvXAY0k93NEpsQ=&domain=792d56e9.streaklinks.com).

      With no common standard or baseline legal requirements, AI companies face perverse incentives to rush products out the door with minimal safety checks.“

    3. Because tacos have a far greater probability of killing you in a miserable fashion. This is not hyperbole.

    4. Midnight_Whispering on

      > The truth is, as even the CEOs of AI labs admit, we are still a long way from understanding how AI systems work and how to make them safe.

      So he wants idiot politicians to regulate something they don’t understand.

    5. Regulations are generally written in blood, so it’ll be a while (and too late to make a difference) before we see regulation on AI, especially while it’s printing money for the people who buy congress.

    Leave A Reply