Mond könnte ein Schatz von 1 Billionen US -Dollar von Edelmetallen sein – ein Goldrang von Mondkollegen kann am Horizont stehen, da eine Studie darauf hindeutet

    https://www.thetimes.com/uk/science/article/moon-could-be-a-treasure-trove-of-precious-metals-say-scientists-nts6mg59b

    Share.

    26 Kommentare

    1. From the article

      Scientists believe that billions of years of asteroid impacts have seeded the lunar surface with a fortune hiding in plain sight: precious metals potentially worth $1 trillion.

      The estimate — described by the team behind it as “conservative” — stems from a study that surveyed the moon’s pockmarked terrain and calculated how many of its craters were likely to have been formed by asteroids rich in platinum group metals (PGMs): ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, osmium, iridium and platinum itself.

      Also from the article

      However, mining on the moon would present formidable technical hurdles. With only a sixth of Earth’s gravity, traditional extraction techniques that rely on weight, pressure or fluid dynamics would be difficult to apply. There is also no liquid water — a particular challenge, since most terrestrial PGM refining methods are water-intensive. Engineers would need to radically rethink how to extract and process ore in a dry vacuum.

      Yet our satellite offers logistical advantages that asteroids — another potential source of mineral wealth — cannot. It is close enough for near real-time remote operation of machinery. Robots could be directed from Earth with just a few seconds’ communications delay, avoiding the need for fully autonomous systems, which would probably be essential for asteroid mining.

    2. Randlepinkfloyd1986 on

      Yeah let’s remove mass from the moon. Zero consequences I’m sure

    3. discographyA on

      $1 trillion in minerals, $3 trillion to get Sam Rockwell to bring them back.

    4. Seeing as a single space shuttle flight with rather limited capacity costs about 1.5bn $ I doubt that this will be feasible at all.

    5. prince-pauper on

      And the prices of precious metals will come down once the scarcity is cut, right? The rich people won’t horde it…. Right??

    6. Meanwhile , the earth is literally burning. Food and water will be higher priorities than minerals.

    7. The Moon is already a treasure, but I get it, according to Capitalism things dont have value if they cant be monetized

      Something something Amazon Rainforest

    8. The study & the values quoted are based on a fallacy, quote:

      >So should investors brace for a collapse in the price of platinum?

      >“Prices could fall if, say, 100 tonnes of PGMs are brought back from the moon in one go,” Vyasanakere said. “But this is very unlikely. The best-case scenario — at least in the early days of lunar mining — is that someone might be able to bring back a few tonnes per year, which shouldn’t affect prices much.”

      >

      The fallacy that the best use & value is obtained mining for rare elements & transporting them earthside. In fact the best value is had by mining for the elements for continued spaceflight & take them to where they can be best utilized outside of Earth’s gravity well.

      For example mining & refining to make oxygen, hydrogen, methane, iron, aluminium etc. Pays the best dividend when those materials are available to build & fuel spacecraft because lifting those elements from the earth to translunar space costs way more than from the moon.

      Also the way to make this pay is for mining/refining operations to sell futures to the other spaceflight operations who will then at some future date utilize those stored assets.

    9. imasysadmin on

      This material should be used in space, not returned to earth. Build structures to generate electricity and filter sunlight to cool the planet at the same time. This is a huge opportunity.

    10. Prestigious_Pipe_251 on

      Thorium.

      The lunar regolith has a good amount of thorium, especially around Copernicus Crater.

      Thorium fuel cycle reactors are coming online, and will be the next step in sustainable energy before nuclear fusion becomes the prime mover.

    11. The operative word in the title is „scattered“ – as in, not concentrated these minerals where they would be easy to mine.

      As an example of how disingenuous this article is, let’s look closer to home – in our oceans. There is an estimated 20 million tons of gold in the oceans (one ton being worth $100 million). However, it has never been mined, because it is not financially feasible to do so. Mining on the moon will be orders of magnitude more difficult.

    12. Noooo don’t mine the moon..you can’t trust people if the moon goes off course even slightly that’s it game over…

    13. An_educated_dig on

      Why not precious metals that can do better for all of humanity? Why the price?

    14. The_Monsta_Wansta on

      Can’t wait to see the vast amount of consequences that this might bring.

    15. Substantial_Funk on

      I’m not a scientist but wouldn’t it be a terrible idea to decrease the weight and mass of an object whose gravity is partially responsible for the unique conditions we need to sustain life?

      Or am I dumb?

    16. so what, only 20-50 years before we can do anything with it… weee

      Ships to earth – too smal for raw materials. SO we need to refine IN space/on moon – so figure that out then sure we might be able to do that.

      Your still talking 1-3 generations away at best.

    17. So they want to collect the scattered iron/nickel asteroid fragments (i.e. SOLID METAL) and remove platinum group metals that are in concentrations of 10 to 100 parts per million? In solid metal? On the moon?

      Even if it’s really easy to just cruise around pick up iron nickel meteorite chunks everywhere, the amount of effort required to separate out the PGM and other desirable materials is gonna be problematic, to say the least.

      Are they looking for investors? Cause this sounds like a grift.

    18. GrimFatMouse on

      Sounds similar to couple decades ago as deep sea mining of nodules was supposed to be mining industry’s next big thing. Haven’t heard about it since.

    19. TheGruenTransfer on

      I would have guessed it would be way more. Like, enough to shatter the precious metals economy. But $1T doesn’t really seem like it would reach that level of scale since it would be a considerable cost to set up a moon mine

    20. VagabondGlider on

      I really hope we as humans don’t find other planets or outer space civilization cause we would just ruin them. The moon was supposed to be off grounds. A place of beauty. Now we wanna go reck the place for minerals.

    21. TheFirstKitten on

      Although there are definitely vast amounts of minerals, letting ANY individual/group/company/nation mune it is the worst precedent to set. They will not stop, they will export all that they physically can, they will completely destroy something so pristine, and one day in the far future it could affect the mass distribution enough that it has permanent effects on the moon-earth relationship

    22. Effective_Motor_4398 on

      Can you just throw a sack of moon sapphires from the moon to earth?

    Leave A Reply