KI -Forschung nimmt einen Rücksitz auf Gewinne, während das Silicon Valley Produkte vor der Sicherheit priorisiert, sagen Experten, sagen Experten

    https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/14/meta-google-openai-artificial-intelligence-safety.html

    Share.

    5 Kommentare

    1. MetaKnowing on

      „In the race to stay competitive, tech companies are taking an increasing number of shortcuts when it comes to the rigorous safety testing of their AI models before they are released to the public, industry experts told CNBC.

      [lots of examples in the article, but hard to summarize]

      OpenAI has also been criticized for[ reportedly](https://www.ft.com/content/8253b66e-ade7-4d1f-993b-2d0779c7e7d8?shareType=nongift) slashing safety testing times from months to days and for omitting the requirement to safety test fine-tuned models in its latest “Preparedness Framework.” 

      Steven Adler, a former safety researcher at OpenAI, told CNBC that safety testing a model before it’s rolled out is no longer enough to safeguard against potential dangers.

      “You need to be vigilant before and during training to reduce the chance of creating a very capable, misaligned model in the first place,” Adler said.

      “Unfortunately, we don’t yet have strong scientific knowledge for fixing these models — just ways of papering over the behavior,” Adler said. 

    2. I predict that one day that a company’s largest data security issue will be the result of AI „acting out“ and deliberately exposing data.

    3. The „ship it now“ mentality cannot be trusted with dangerous technology. Regulations are needed.

    4. unleash_the_giraffe on

      Meanwhile, techbros think the Eu will be left „behind“ because of regulations. But behind what? Without regulation rampant Ai will just lead to vastly dimished life quality? Risk mitigation is sane.

    5. Why does this need experts?

      Profits have always taken priority for thousands of years. It’s nothing new or unexpected.

    Leave A Reply