What I find most interesting about this is the fact that it allows rice cultivation in areas where it wasn’t possible before.
Also the lack of flooding means less methane emissions
KalessinDB on
I was under the impression that no rice *required* flooding, just that it *tolerated* flooding and the pests that fed on it would be killed by said flooding, so it was beneficial to do such?
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
2 Kommentare
What I find most interesting about this is the fact that it allows rice cultivation in areas where it wasn’t possible before.
Also the lack of flooding means less methane emissions
I was under the impression that no rice *required* flooding, just that it *tolerated* flooding and the pests that fed on it would be killed by said flooding, so it was beneficial to do such?