Share.

    32 Kommentare

    1. Cobra-Lalalalalalala on

      Libs didn’t ‘win,’ the Constitution won by holding the line between church and state, for now at least.

    2. Somebody probably told her if you use taxpayer funds for Christian schools, you’ll have to do all the other religions too.

    3. >It was not immediately clear why Justice Coney Barrett—whom President Donald Trump appointed in 2020—recused herself from the case, which meant she did not take part in oral arguments or the final ruling.

      >The New York Times speculated that Coney Barrett’s decision could have stemmed from her close relationship with Nicole Stelle Garnett, who was previously an adviser for the Oklahoma school.

      >Coney Barrett and Garnett worked together at the Supreme Court in the 1990s before becoming colleagues at Notre Dame Law School.

      >Coney Barrett has fallen out of the MAGA crowd in recent months after siding with her liberal counterparts in some high-profile cases.

    4. TintedApostle on

      Libs a win? You mean upholding teh 1st amendment and understanding you have a conflict of interest?

      If upholding the Constitution is being a liberal than we know how to completely define republicans.

    5. Blueskyways on

      What is this libs win bullshit?  I’m more conservative than most and this was a great decision for the Constitution.  Parents always have the option to send their kids to a religious private school but it shouldn’t be funded by taxpayers.   

    6. Afraid-Savings-9114 on

      When following the Constitution is a „win“ for liberals, you know we are truly cooked.

    7. WeirdJack49 on

      Kinda ironic that the christian fundamentalist and former handmaid voted against it.

      I guess MAGA is kinda upset about her constantly voting out of line.

    8. Late-Dingo-8567 on

      so gross to frame it this way. Its a core principle of this country.

      The same folks in favor of this would be frothing at the mouth if we used taxpayer money to fund muslim schools….

    9. She can have whatever views she wants as long as she doesn’t just throw out the Constitution. Not a high bar but a bar I’ll accept

    10. clickmagnet on

      Coney-Barrett’s decision was to not be plainly corrupt as humanly possible for one fucking day, by staying home. On the GOP bravery scale she has yet to register even one Mike Pence – and Mike Pence was the world’s most obsequious quisling, right up to the day he was finally ordered to do something that might have gotten him prosecuted. 

    11. God, we’re cooked. „Libs“ win because there was a tie vote over a central tenet of the Constitution? Fuck all the way off. 

    12. Do_not_use_after on

      How was this not 9-0 to the constitution. America, you have a serious justice problem.

    13. viv_savage11 on

      She actually recused herself which her republican peers have refused to do as I remember. She gets points for that imo. I hope she continues to behave ethically because we desperately need her vote.

    14. TheBatemanFlex on

      Framing it as a win for liberals as though both sides are twisting the constitution in equal measure to fit their respective interests is part of why we are in this mess.

    15. So, adhering to the literal text of the Constitution governing document of the United States is now a Lib win.

    16. cad_internet on

      Am I wrong in thinking that Barrett has been ruling based on her actual legal interpretations instead of always voting along party lines? Seems like mango didn’t put a complete shill on the SC?

    17. It’s not a fucking “lib win”

      There is separation of church and state in this country. This is a win for American principles. And a loss for traitors.

    18. some organization should try to make a state sponsored islamic school and make that go through the courts so that the supreme court has to rule that religious schools are not constitutional (because they of course wouldn’t want an islamic state supported school)…problem fixed.

    19. APirateAndAJedi on

      If you told me, after her confirmation, that Amy Coney Barrett would one day be the one person stopping us from sliding into a theocratic dystopia, I’d have told you you’re an idiot.

    20. Not the libs. The constitution. It says very clearly there’s separation of church and state.

    21. reefersutherland91 on

      Her being the deciding factor in this and other cases is surprising. Recusing herself from a religion driven case is properly ethical. Perhaps Clearance Thomas pissed her off with all the porn.

    22. The 2A literalists with tattoos on their entire back screaming „Shall not be infringed!“ would also like you to know that the First Amendment is entirely optional.

    23. williamgman on

      This. Is. Not. A. Fucking. Win.

      This is a delay. The can has been kicked down the road to allow a different angle next time.

    24. StoneColdPieFiller on

      This is an American win. A constitutional win. Not a liberal win. Our media is so fucked.

    25. RealPersonResponds on

      „Amy Coney Barrett Decision Gives AMERICANS WHO FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION Win in Shock SCOTUS Ruling“.

    26. Maleficent-Poet5973 on

      She didn’t give Libs a win. She has principles and a code of ethics so she recused herself. It’s a shame that more people don’t do the same. She has gained my respect and gives me hope that other judges and politicians may follow her example.

    27. wilson_rawls on

      Rule of law is not a win for one side over the other. It’s not a cricket match. I hate politics in this country.

    28. Bluestorm123 on

      Would not have thought she’d be the one I’m praying for to jump ship each session

    Leave A Reply