Kann mir jemand erklären, was in diesem Fall mit dem Parken vor dem weißen Van falsch ist?
https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1ks41mv
Von Strict-Coyote-9807
Kann mir jemand erklären, was in diesem Fall mit dem Parken vor dem weißen Van falsch ist?
https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1ks41mv
Von Strict-Coyote-9807
10 Kommentare
My guess is that it’s not a street and you’re not allowed to park without a extra sign
looks like it is parked on the walkway
[https://maps.app.goo.gl/5Husqn48srFuV19N8](https://maps.app.goo.gl/5Husqn48srFuV19N8)
And I suppose it’s wrong because there is no sign that allows parking on the pedestrian walkway.
It is parking on the grass, that used to be there before the cars ruined it…
Which vehicle are we talking about? The white van?
Doesn’t look like a parking space, it looks like there’s supposed to be grass growing there, it just isn’t because people keep parking there. You aren’t allowed to park on verges/sidewalks.
To me it looks like it’s parked in the middle of a one-way street. Look how far off the curb it is.
If it doesn’t have the sign „Verkehrszeichen 315-66“ you’re not allowed to park there.
quite sure the van isn’t allowed to park there either, so…
there’s a parking lot on the other side of revaler strasse anyway, so why not use this?
If you received a parking ticket, the reason is always stated on the ticket. However, I don’t see any reason why one shouldn’t park here. I would park there too.
I would just like to add this photo – it means nothing these metal bars? Looks like a separation for card to park [image](https://freeimage.host/i/3QRYtB2)
Are there any grounds to try to fight this ticket based on such confusion?