Submission Statement: Exploring a prompt exchange with ChatGPT, where the o3 model was challenged to craft an all-new set of completely novel/original thought experiments on „life, the universe, and everything“. The piece unpacks how creative prompting can turn an AI into a creative partner and hints at a future where crowds test and refine micro-theories in all kinds of different fields. How might we be more intentional about crafting and stress-testing novel ideas in the future?
Physicle_Partics on
As a physicist: No. Your examples are ideas grabbed out of thin air by a machine chopping up crackpot physics and quantum woowoo and spitting it out in excerpts that sound impressive because they use specialist terms in non-specialist contexts. Radical new ideas in physics have never come from outsiders dreaming up conjectures and expecting specialists to prove or disprove them – they come from highly trained and specialised thinkers who notice discrepancies between current theories and experimental results, and who attacks it with meticulous mathematical rigor.
Your outputs are pseudo-spritual semi-philosophical musings by a machine regurgitating concepts it has seen misapplied by the crackpot side of the internet. AI does not have access to any fundamental nature of the universe.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
2 Kommentare
Submission Statement: Exploring a prompt exchange with ChatGPT, where the o3 model was challenged to craft an all-new set of completely novel/original thought experiments on „life, the universe, and everything“. The piece unpacks how creative prompting can turn an AI into a creative partner and hints at a future where crowds test and refine micro-theories in all kinds of different fields. How might we be more intentional about crafting and stress-testing novel ideas in the future?
As a physicist: No. Your examples are ideas grabbed out of thin air by a machine chopping up crackpot physics and quantum woowoo and spitting it out in excerpts that sound impressive because they use specialist terms in non-specialist contexts. Radical new ideas in physics have never come from outsiders dreaming up conjectures and expecting specialists to prove or disprove them – they come from highly trained and specialised thinkers who notice discrepancies between current theories and experimental results, and who attacks it with meticulous mathematical rigor.
Your outputs are pseudo-spritual semi-philosophical musings by a machine regurgitating concepts it has seen misapplied by the crackpot side of the internet. AI does not have access to any fundamental nature of the universe.