Wenn erhöhte Blockgrößen aufgrund hoher Kosten zu wenige Bergleute führen und die vertikale Skalierung zu Überlastungen, Gebührenspitzen und verringerten Effizienz führt, was bei den Markttrends übrig bleibt. Der Analysten untersucht den aktuellen Trend, der zu Beginn von Bitcoin bis zur heutigen wirtschaftlichen horizontalen Skalierung zurückgeht. Was bedeutet das für die mögliche Zukunft von Bitcoin? (Dies wurde für Einzelhandel und neue Investoren vereinfacht.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcxgo_se0j4&list=plguysz6echv11dpgly328tzunzr8bs2hh&index=3&pp=iaqb
4 Kommentare
This is not 2017
You know- I was and still am someone who loved bitcoins core mission.
I found I was using Litecoin for transactions though. Since this specifically happened with me, and many others I interacted with across the Bitcoin blockchain, I began to realize Bitcoin wasn’t functioning on its own.
After that I realized I had been using Litecoin to scale Bitcoin, lower fees, faster. This all made sense to me as what I was actually doing already. Pretty much everyone at Litecoin is saying the same thing.
Apply capitalism to Bitcoin…. Why side chains exist and block sizes are not increasing….
We live in a capitalist system not charity. California does this with its electricity all the time… Creates fake shortages to increase profits
Let’s create network congestion to sell you a solution… What is the lighting network for 400$ Alex?
“All other coins are using code that could not obtain consensus.”
You know better about Litecoin.
You also know it has Lightning, taproot, and SegWit.
If the market is moving on as the trend suggests, and you’re running in place waiting for applications to be placed which are years away, this evolves without you.