Share.

    22 Kommentare

    1. By Andrew Stanton — Weekend Staff Writer |

      In oral arguments about birthright citizenship on Thursday, Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett confronted Solicitor General D. John Sauer on the Trump administration’s approach to respecting court rulings.

      Newsweek reached out to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for comment via email.

      The nation’s highest court heard arguments about whether lower courts have the authority to block President Donald Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship, which ensures that children born in the U.S. are citizens regardless of their parents‘ status. The court’s ruling could have key implications for millions of Americans.

      Read more: [https://www.newsweek.com/amy-coney-barrett-confronts-d-john-sauer-rulings-supreme-court-2072962](https://www.newsweek.com/amy-coney-barrett-confronts-d-john-sauer-rulings-supreme-court-2072962)

    2. ProudSexyLady on

      It’s interesting to see Amy Coney Barrett challenge the Trump admin lawyer. It’s important for all branches of government to respect court rulings. This could be a sign of her independence and commitment to the rule of law.

    3. EntinthetentRTHP on

      Is this our “I never thought I’d die fighting beside an elf” moment?

    4. „SCOTUS fine with theo-fascist oligarchy, so long as we’re among the oligarchs, so don’t try to cut us out of the power structure.“

    5. This is not a sign of conservatives pushing back against Trump, for anyone naive enough to believe that. This is just Barrett trying to protect her own power.

    6. nasorrty346tfrgser on

      MAGA would call her a DEI no matter what, because she is a she, not he.

    7. commanderclif on

      First lesson she should have confronted him with was honoring the Constitution.

    8. raelelectricrazor232 on

      It turns out that creating monsters without leashes or muzzles is fraught with danger.

    9. ProfessorUnhappy5997 on

      Instead of blanking her, trump should have shaken acb’s hand, at the state of union 2025 lol

    10. nanopicofared on

      Wouldn’t be an issue if SCOTUS hadn’t given Trump immunity for „official acts“.

    11. I love she’s sticking to the law and not bending to MAGA.
      Never agree with all her views but as long as she upholds the constitution I couldn’t care less.

    12. VoughtHunter on

      She confronted him for following a precedent they set… its not really a confrontation

    13. Helicopternoises on

      But will vote to the end birthright citizenship anyway. Spine is only temporary.

    14. What’s that? You actually are a justice and not a shill? Or will you slant the ruling to still benefit donny 2 dolls?

    15. She read the writing on the wall. After this administration is done removing trans rights, birthright citizenship, gay rights.. Guess who’s next? Amy and Clarence can pick straws to see which one loses their rights first, but it doesn’t really matter because they’ll both be used and discarded by the end of it.

    16. Raxistaicho on

      It’s kinda sad how the most disgusting justices aren’t even the ones Trump foisted onto the SCOTUS.

      I bet the Heritage Foundation is livid at how ACB turned out.

    Leave A Reply