Lehrer, die KI verwenden, um die Arbeit ihrer Schüler zu bewerten
https://www.yahoo.com/news/teachers-using-ai-grade-students-103007760.html
Lehrer, die KI verwenden, um die Arbeit ihrer Schüler zu bewerten
https://www.yahoo.com/news/teachers-using-ai-grade-students-103007760.html
14 Kommentare
I think the message is actually:
>Lazy, largely useless, teachers have always existed and their use of AI to grade identifies them more clearly.
Sadly they won’t get replaced because there already aren’t enough teachers.
I think AI might be making both teachers and their students increasingly worthless and boring people.
Clickbait title thats citing a literal snarky reddit comment as its first example.
This article is slop.
Oh, OK 🙄 when businesses use AI, that’s good! When teachers use it, BAD. Absolute teacher-attacking nonsense. If teachers are employing AI, it’s because their workloads have been increasing exponentially.
Society would be better if we stopped making so many blanket statements and looking for generalizing negative aspects over whole categories…Try this:
# „Some“ Teachers Using AI to Grade Their Students‘ Work Sends a Clear Message: Good teachers are actually an immensely valuable resource, the rest will be made obsolete
Although we know why they frame it the way they are framing it…
I have huge issues with penmanship!
I am glad that my job teaching focuses on penmanship.
Teachers are pointless unless they teach penmanship.
Math died when they started to use calculators.
lol
It’s so much more work to plug in individual papers and ask for grading, then curate the grading and return the work, than it is to just skim or give everyone a B.
What a silly premise.
I don’t think teachers will ever be replaced. Kids need a human connection
Teachers will be one of the safer jobs moving forward imo. People aren’t gonna want robots teaching their kids and classrooms are important no matter how you slice it. I can’t imagine moving on from humans teachers in my lifetime.
The White House just pushed another EO to put AI in classrooms. This teacher is just ahead of the curve.
It’s not the teachers, it’s the whole antiquated education system that isn’t fit for purpose in 2025.
AI might not take your job, but someone who uses AI certainly will (if you don’t use it).
AI, automation, and robotics are where every business is aggressively headed right now.
That said, anyone who thinks AI will replace teachers has never taught a classroom. What do you think will happen when no teacher is in the classroom? We learned real strong during Covid that parents are unprepared at getting kids to do unstructured self-paced training.
Assuming that grading is the most important job of a teacher is such a stupid take. The first job is teaching, surprising given the name of the profession. Grading is their version of busy work. Love to see them being able to focus more of their efforts on passing out knowledge.
Submission statement
A study from the University of Georgia found that AI accurately graded student work only 33.5% of the time when left to create their own rubrics. Yet schools continue to invest in AI grading tools, not necessarily because they are effective but because they symbolize progress.
The irony is that AI is being used to evaluate students while students are banned from using AI. This contradiction is indicative of eeducation’s struggle to define AI’s role. If AI is too unreliable to grade fairly, why trust it at all? If AI is inevitable, why not teach students how to use it responsibly rather than punish them for doing so?