Die Untersuchung in Terrebonne Nach einem von den Wahlen gemachten Elections Canada -Rückgabetechnik an den Absender hat die unbekannte Anzahl von Wählern betroffen. Mindestens ein BQ -Wähler sagt, ihr Stimmzettel sei in die Post zurückgekommen.
https://ici.radio-canada.ca/ohdio/premiere/emissions/le-15-18/segments/rattrapage/2068282/une-erreur-elections-canada-lui-fait-perdre-son-vote-dans-terrebonne
3 Kommentare
Seems like the inevitable outcome with a margin that close. I don’t know how this is going to end up, but there will likely be a lengthy court battle over this. You can always find one voter who will say they weren’t able to vote for some reason or another.
Good! Don’t let the tinfoil hat wearing sour losers take over the narrative of election fraud, get this out and showcase the lengths and breadth of scrutiny taking place ensuring our elections are kept fair and counted properly.
Mistakes may and can happen, but should be investigated and issues rectified to prevent future repeat occurrences and in meantime if a review of this finds the scope and number of affected voters could have an impact on outcomes they can legally dictate a bi-election “re-do”.
On the image there doesn’t appear to be any marks that would confirm the date the elector says they mailed it.
Without confirmation of the mailing date, i.e. was it a valid ballot in the first place, there’s no reason to even consider the returned mail aspect of this. The return sticker probably has a process date(s) embedded in that code.
Obviously they need to do an investigation, there are likely more than one returned ballots.