Kritische Bewertung des Cass -Berichts: methodische Fehler und nicht unterstützte Ansprüche | BMC Medical Research Methodology
https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-025-02581-7
Von OpticalData
Kritische Bewertung des Cass -Berichts: methodische Fehler und nicht unterstützte Ansprüche | BMC Medical Research Methodology
https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-025-02581-7
Von OpticalData
2 Kommentare
Policy should be supported good science, if they’ve used bad science the report authors should be hauled up before parliament and made to answer for themselves for misleading parliament and the nation.
Punishment, I’ve no idea because they, like Wakefield, will probably bugger off to America and either make themselves a martyr for the right or end-up employed at Trump University’s School of Bigly MAGA Science.
Woman complains about missing a few football games for breaking conduct rules – 1000 comments top of the sub.
Pretty signficant paper on the report that gets cited here 140 times a day, crickets