Stephen Miller enthüllt die vollständige Definition von „ordnungsgemäßem Prozess“. Der Trump -Berater versucht, die Verfassung neu zu definieren, um seine extreme Einwanderungsagenda durchzuführen.
https://newrepublic.com/post/194875/stephen-miller-definition-due-process-immigration
38 Kommentare
Just need enough SCOTUS justices to appreciate this „original“ reading of the Founders‘ intent
„If everyone knows you’re guilty, why have a trial?“ is essentially his logic. Please no follow-up questions about how everyone would know that.
Stephen Himmler is the main driving force behind this deportation business. Odious little runt.
He is quite possibly the least tolerable person alive today.
Whatever definitions they might have, if it doesn’t apply to everyone in the administration, it shouldn’t apply to anyone.
[ Removed by Reddit ]
“No Due Process” was right there in the MAGA Carta.
I can’t wait for the reckoning for Mr. Miller. He’ll find out what most of us think of nazis when the time comes and he doesn’t have shitler to protect him.
Even if he was correct that due process is to protect citizens from their government and not illegal aliens, people accused of being illegal aliens still need due process rights in order to ensure citizens aren’t accidentally denied due process.
I wonder where the Nuremberg trials will be held in America when this is all over?
His idea of due process is humans being processed through a exsanguination factory
White House Deputy Chief of Staff and Voldemort on a good day, Stephen Miller.
“What is it about the phrase ‘no person’—as in ‘no person shall be … deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law’—that you seem to be unable to get into your thick, sociopathic skull?” [asked](https://x.com/gtconway3d/status/1919472273825673511) George Conway.
Well, in all fairness, Stephen Miller is a really for real actual Nazi, and doesn’t think immigrants are people.
He is one ugly motherfucker.
Might come as a shock, but Stephen Miller isn’t a lawyer and has zero legal expertise. His „definition“ if you’d call it that, is about as logical as Trump’s plan to deal with child care costs. He’s a total racist moron who should keep legal stuff to legal people. Or, hopefully, until his Nuremberg style trial after all of this.
> “The right of ‘due process’ is to protect citizens from their government, not to protect foreign trespassers from removal,” wrote Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller on Monday morning.
Yes, but how would you prevent an American citizen from accidentally being sent to a foreign prison? Due process.
This administration is so determined to deport people, they don’t care if the people they deport are guilty of any crimes or not. But was to claim they are violent gang members, without actually proving it.
>The right of “due process” is to protect citizens from their government, not to protect foreign trespassers from removal. Due process guarantees the rights of a criminal defendant facing prosecution, not an illegal alien facing deportation.
This is a variation of the argument made by the right-wing Hillsdale College in their pitch against birthright citizenship.
There is more to the attack on birthright citizenship than meets the eye. The goal of ending birthright citizenship is just a means to a much worse end.
The right’s real intent is redefine what it is to be born subject to US jurisdiction so that they can take the next leap of redefining what it is to be subject to US jurisdiction under all circumstances. The step that follows is for the courts not having any jurisdiction at all over anyone who the executive branch determines is excluded from that jurisdiction.
Using their birthright citizenship argument, that „subject to jurisdiction“ determination will be based upon whether the executive decides that this person is subject to an undefined „social contract“ that determines whether or not the court has jurisdiction.
The definition of jurisdiction is not particularly controversial and would at least on the surface appear to remain as is. The issue will become who is excluded from it, and that determination would be made by the executive branch without the courts. This „social contract“ is sufficiently vague that it can exclude whatever or whoever Dear Leader wants it to.
Too bad this strategy works. If they told Republicans „we’ve never had a constitution, the president has always been a king“, after a few weeks, a measurable percent of Republicans would be parroting it.
> The presumption of innocence has been recognized in several U.S. Supreme Court decisions. In Coffin v. United States, the High Court wrote, “the presumption of innocence in favor of the accused is the undoubted law, axiomatic and elementary, and its enforcement lies at the foundation of the administration of our criminal law.”
I get the impression he knows he’s in the cross hairs of the court contempt charges. So he’s rolling out BS to create a smoke screen.
I wonder how he’d fair as an incarcerated individual?
Maybe he just wasn’t able to read all the way to Amendment 5? But lord, I’ve never wished an inconveniently placed window in a high rise building so much as I have wished one for him.
“Where’d you go to law school, Stephen?”
“I didn’t.”
“No shit.”
This fucker doesn’t have total immunity, lock his ass up
Subhuman says what?
Yeah, this guy is the dark evil behind all of this.
One day Stephen Miller will be arrested for his crimes he will then spend the rest of his life locked away in a prison cell and he will die from all the bile and hate in His heart and no will remember him.
Here’s the deal with peewee hitler. Anyone can say anything when at the podium. It might be rude, preposterous, ignorant, insulting, etc. BUT he’s not in a court of law, if he truly believes what he says get him in court to say it.
1. The administration will never let him go to court. They’ll move him somewhere else or whatever’s. They know he’s an a**hole. But He’s there a**hole
2. If they do sacrifice him, he’ll turn on the Trump administration faster then you can blink. He’s not brave, or courageous. He’s a little boy who always wanted to be a big boy and now it’s his turn.
„Guilty people shouldn’t have the privilege of due process“ is basically the argument.
Stephen Miller is a Nazi.
Just push him out into the sunlight and see what happens
I’m older than this incel nazi and I look ten years younger. Hate really seems to age you.
You can’t know who is and who is not documented without due process.
Any argument otherwise is Nazi bull and should be treated as such
Let’s fix the headline: to redefine the Constitution to carry out the White Suprematist Project 2025 agenda.
This fucking nutsack of a face having bitch.
That little twerker is going to look so good in prison clothes!
>The right of ‘due process’ is to protect citizens from their government, not to protect foreign trespassers from removal,”
So how exactly do you tell the citizens from the foreign trespassers unless everyone gets the chance to prove they are who they claim…which is due process
Here’s the deal, if they don’t get due process, then citizens don’t get due process.
So say I’m a Native American. I have darker skin than white people. Similar features to a Mexican. Let’s say I’m on the shorter side. I have a labor job doing bricks with several illegal aliens working beside me.
ICE comes and picks up all of us including me.
The Trump admin states “look at them. They all look exactly the same, we picked them up working construction! It’s clear what these people are. Why would we give illegal aliens due process?”
Then I’m fucked simply for existing and not being white.
What happens to MY due process in that scenario?? How do I prove that I’m a citizen when I’m not given the opportunity??
If they don’t get due process, then anybody and i mean anybody can get scooped up right into this exact same mess. So even if the Supreme Court wanted to rule that illegal aliens weren’t afforded due process, they would fuck over every single actual citizen who would be refused due process due to “obvious” situations
World’s dumbest Richelieu