DOGE -Effizienz: Die Einsparungen von 2 Billionen Einsparungen fielen auf 160 Mrd. Mit den Kosten von 135 Mrd. beträgt die Nettoeinsparungen 25 Mrd.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doge-cuts-cost-135-billion-analysis-elon-musk-department-of-government-efficiency/

    Share.

    38 Kommentare

    1. Historical_Bend_2629 on

      Tell thousands of federal workers and scientists that it was worth it. They are totally stoked. How thrifty and smart!

    2. Notchibald_Johnson on

      Yeah, you’d almost think that was never the goal to begin with.

    3. The U.S. dollar is also worth 7% less today than it was in January. So that $25 bn isn’t even as valuable.

    4. SurroundTiny on

      Is that counting all the people they hired back because they realized they shouldn’t have been fired?

    5. aflyingsquanch on

      Does that include the $500 Billion in lost revenue just from the IRS cuts alone?

    6. Classic Musk: took something effective, gutted it in the name of efficiency theater at trillion-dollar scale.

      – Twitter
      – SolarCity
      – Hyperloop
      – OpenAI (by defection)
      – Tesla
      – Neurolink
      – the boring company

      And now, The US Government.

    7. With the cuts to research, aid and other academic programs, I wouldn’t be shocked to see that this entire fiasco has cost us trillions of dollars.

    8. The cost so far, there are multiple court cases that need defending that will increase costs, and potentially decrease savings.

    9. I’d rather have the FDA, SEC, FBI, CIA, USAID, and all those little interdepartmental agencies whose jobs were hard to define but mainly made things run smoother.

    10. hamsterfolly on

      And that total will fall even further after all the lawsuits about illegal firings and department defunding wind their way through the courts.

    11. bestforward121 on

      Where are the receipts that prove DOGE saved anything at all? Why the hell do these journalists just take these lying fascists at their word?

    12. And add the demolition of regulatory bodies and our tax funded scientific research. They fulfilled their promise, and MAGA, stupid as they are, think they have inside knowledge of what and why this happened.

    13. Bye_Zantium on

      Oh, just wait until the wolves start eating their fill. Securities fraud that won’t be investigated; bosses embezzling the 401(k); water tables polluted; new products that cannot get approved; kids missing multiple school-days due to completely preventable diseases; etc. etc. And that’s to say nothing about Mr. Tariffs and the Great Leap Backwards.

      This ass-hat and his crew of teenage boys will make 2008 look cheap in comparison.

    14. When you add in legal fees fighting the illegality, loss of revenue to the lack of manpower in the IRS, people refusing to pay taxes due to the turmoil, the decline in the US dollar, and the host of revenues lost to the tariffs; the $25B in savings turns into a deficit.

      And the loss to the U.S. world power and influence is inestimable and goes far, far, far beyond any cuts that were made/

    15. stayathmdad on

      Could have just had fElon pay his taxes, and everyone would have been able to keep their jobs!

    16. teebalicious on

      The cost in human suffering and the nullification of advancement is indescribable.

      There is no dollar amount that could possibly make up for this wanton fascist destruction of projects and programs that benefit people all over the globe.

      The fact that this was done as deliberate harm by narcissistic sociopaths to feed an identity cult whose only goal is to leverage hateful and violent power fantasies to eke out tiny amounts of dopamine from their smooth and tiny brains makes ANY imagined “benefit” moot.

      These are absolute psychos, so consumed by their own fragility that being the apex predators of capitalism is not enough, they need to perform this cruelty every second of every day to convince themselves that their compensatory narrative is real.

      The whole thing is a narcissism cult. Every one of these dipshits has to feel like the coolest kid in the cafeteria at every moment, shoving everyone else into lockers to feel big because they literally can’t feel anything else, and if anything shatters their delusion of being Genghis Khan on a throne of the skulls of their imagined and fabricated enemies in a palace full of slaves and underage concubines, they’ll die.

      It’s literally pathological. And they will not stop, they must be stopped.

    17. mechanicalejay on

      Thanks MAGA -this is great! Oh let me guess this doesn’t include the 500 billion dollars lost with no IRS 🙃

    18. Plus a $500B loss in tax revenue.. also the $160B in savings is largely just a lie

    19. charcoalist on

      1. They aren’t auditors.
      2. Their entire purpose was to steal the most sensitive data in the United States, and hand it off to Russia.

      From a whistleblower at the National Labor Relations Board:

      >This declaration details DOGE activity within NLRB, the exfiltration of data from NLRB systems, and – concerningly – near real-time access by users in Russia. Notably, within minutes of DOGE personnel creating user accounts in NLRB systems, on multiple occasions someone or something within Russia attempted to login using all of the valid credentials (eg. Usernames/Passwords). This, combined with verifiable data being systematically exfiltrated to unknown servers within the continental United States – and perhaps abroad – merits investigation.

      [https://www.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1ke0k8a/whistleblowing_in_federal_it_what_i_did_why_it/](https://www.reddit.com/r/fednews/comments/1ke0k8a/whistleblowing_in_federal_it_what_i_did_why_it/)

    20. areappreciated on

      Wait, how do you spend $135B in 100 days when you weren’t appropriated any of that money by Congress and your department didn’t exist?

    21. theoldshrike on

      these are the best massaged numbers that they could come up with and given the source, I expect they’re as reliable as trump’s property evaluations

    22. And with reduction in services and things that actually benefit the economy, maybe not today but in the future, this is a money losing venture

    23. To be fair, shouldn’t we be evaluating this over a longer time horizon? If you eliminate a bureaucrat position, you are not just eliminating his salary for this year or even his lifetime earnings. You are permanently eliminating this expenditure forever. Unless the next administration hires someone for that position.

    24. SidratFlush on

      Except the loss of departmental knowledge is far far higher than the financial report will ever tell you.

    25. RobbyRock75 on

      And it’s not savings in that it was already budgeted for and amounts to the loss of what services and people?

      the way they are couching these “ savings “ is highly dubious in defining if they “ save “ American’s anything

    26. CompetitiveTart505S on

      Now adjust for increased government spending, economic retaliation/recession, and a loss of revenue due to the IRS being cut.

    27. gingerbreademperor on

      Don’t even play their accounting game. 25bn in „net savings“ can mean „healthcare in rural area abolished“ and this must remain the debate point

    28. moderatenerd on

      Republicans always fail in their lofty goals because the things they think are issues aren’t really issues.

      At least if democrats try to make things better we try to come up with a sensible plan and attempt to implement it in a way that makes sense

    29. „Net Saving“ is doing some heavy lifting considering everything that was lost that didn’t HAVE to be lost.

    30. There aren’t any real net savings—just short-term accounting tricks. Over time, the reduced investment in public services will cost Americans far more.

    31. IvanTortuga on

      They haven’t saved a penny. They’ve cost us an untold fortune in newly unemployed thousands

    32. Comprehensive-Ad4815 on

      The difference between 25 billion and 2 trillion is almost EXACTLY 2 trillion

    Leave A Reply