Trump unterschreibt Anordnungen, die sich an Schutzstädte abziehen und militärische Beteiligung an den Strafverfolgungsbehörden beantragen | Trumps Befehl versuchen, die Polizei vor rechtlichen Auswirkungen zu schützen und das Militär in die Durchsetzung einzubeziehen

    https://www.salon.com/2025/04/28/signs-orders-targeting-sanctuary-cities-seeking-military-involvement-in-law-enforcement/

    Share.

    41 Kommentare

    1. Rough-Adeptness-6670 on

      The time is coming when everyone is going to have to pick a side and there will be no turning back. You are either part of the dictator’s police state or you are actively fighting it.

    2. TheRedheadedMonster on

      Waiting for all the 2A “mah rights” crowd to show up, they’ll care any second, right??

    3. CouchCorrespondent on

      # *Protect police from legal repercussions

      # *Involving the military in enforcement

      This has ramped up SEVERAL levels in our country.

    4. Financial-Special766 on

      So either you’re supporting the billionaire class agenda to control everything and everyone and still steal from you even though you do their bidding or you’re supporting freedom and the American people.

      Take your pick. I know where I stand.

    5. RoosterMedical on

      Trump’s policies will increase poverty and crime will follow and people of colour will be used for target practice as a result.

    6. “There’s a reason you separate military and the police. One fights the enemies of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people.”

    7. TheDarkHelmet1985 on

      Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 signed by Rutherford B. Hayes, amended in 1956, 1981, and 2021 to include all branches of the military and is not just some old law. It limits the power of the federal government in the use of federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies within the US. Essentially the military can’t be used in civilian law enforcement action. Blatantly illegal under the existing law. Not that DJT or any of his cultists care enough about the law to enforce that but I do still have faith in SCOTUS with the exceptions of Thomas and Alito who are clear partisan hacks. I’m starting to believe Coney-Barrett, Gorsuch, and Party Boy all have a line they won’t cross out of principle. I disagree with many of their decisions legally but can respect their legal minds.

    8. Didn’t L.A. try this in the late 80’s and early 90’s? Pete Wilson and Daryl Gates tried to strongarm LA to it’s will, crescendo with Rodney King beating and the riots. Pretty sure this is where we are headed. Didn’t work out to well.

    9. Classicman269 on

      The big quest is that the military is going to accept this? Veterans or current military, what are your thoughts on this? You know that this is illegal and unconstitutional. How do you think the military will respond?

    10. They’re preparing for what’s coming this summer. Once the shelves go bare, mass layoffs begin as the economy craters, people start losing their homes and ability to put food on the table, it’s going to get really ugly in a way people can’t comprehend. That’s what the military is going to be used for – restoring order from the inevitable response to the desperation of the people. Also note the story that came out a few days ago about the administration looking into suspending habeas corpus which makes sense if you’re about to implement martial law. Usually those things go hand in hand, so the picture is becoming clearer for what Republicans have in store for the country.

    11. >***The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite. ~ Thomas Jefferson***

      US needs to rewrite the Constitution as tRUMP is like W.C. Fields in that he is always „looking for a loophole“ and finding them. The Constitution was meant to protect from an absolute monarch or a dictatorship happening in the US.

      >Donald Trump may be a fan of archaic laws, but an executive order signed on Monday shows he has little concern for the Posse Comitatus Act.

      >In an order focused on protecting law enforcement officers from legal repercussions, Trump included an aside to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Attorney General Pam Bondi. It asked the duo to „determine how military and national security assets, training, non-lethal capabilities, and personnel can most effectively be utilized to prevent crime.“

      > Using „personnel“ to „prevent crime“ seems to run afoul of the 1878 law, which is one sentence long.

      >

    12. Executive orders aren’t laws and states have rights.

      I will not live in a Police State, especially not one run by these clowns.

      I will not obey.

    13. PlayTheWarBanjos on

      Serious question: what is with Trump’s obsession with using the military for local, domestic law enforcement? He doesn’t trust the local police to do their jobs?

    14. Honestly, if the police actually cared, they could change the public opinion in their favor if they play their cards right. Decades of distrust could simply go away.

      They won’t, but that’s the type of spin I need to get me through the day.

    15. As a current senior active duty member, myself and many other colleagues fucking hate this and want no part. The military is to protect the people of its nation from foreign threats.

    16. PhysicalGraffiti75 on

      All those “slippery slope” folks sure seem to have up and disappeared. Odd ain’t it? They cried about it for decades but the moment it actually starts happening they shut their mouths.

    17. Oceanbreeze871 on

      He can’t wait to order permanent martial law under the guise of some fake emergency. He’s just waiting for an excuse.

      “I love democracy. I love the Republic. Once this crisis has abated, I will lay down the powers you have given me!”-emperor Donald, soon enough.

    18. rodentmaster on

      Using the US military to attack its own citizens…. Where have we seen this before?

    19. Oceanbreeze871 on

      Imagine enlisting in the military just so you can violate the constitution and occupy an American city, holding civilians at gunpoint?

      That’s not service.

    20. Well, it was a good run, America. You showed the world how democracy can and does work and for the 240 plus years, you rocked it. Thank you.

      And now, you are running headfirst into authoritarian oblivion. You are ruled by an odious, feckless, corrupt and neo-nazi cabal of corrupt fascists, oligarchs,and technocrats. I really hope that you do not crash the rest of the world as you implode.

    21. Trying to solidify his hold on power before he gets removed, impeached, whatever.

      How many red flags is it going to take before the republicans see that?

    22. Every soldier is taught that using the U.S. military against civilians is illegal. This is outlined in 18 U.S. Code § 1385 — the Posse Comitatus Act — which prohibits the use of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Space Force for domestic law enforcement. Interestingly, the political left strongly opposed President Biden’s consideration of using the military to enforce COVID-19 lockdowns.

    Leave A Reply