Share.

    11 Kommentare

    1. Perlentaucher on

      *A leaked paper reveals that Germany’s conservative political parties, the Christian Democratic Union and Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU), want to add a clause to Germany’s Nationality Law to allow the country to revoke German nationality from dual nationals if they are deemed “supporters of terrorism, antisemites and extremists.”*

      I have no problem with this.

    2. Prize-Tip-2745 on

      Did Not know dual Citizenship is a human right.
      I disagree with this being a violation of human rights. This will be decided by the Bundestag and the courts.
      Post Script: i am well aware of Article 16 and its phrasing leaves Open to defiinition

    3. eats-you-alive on

      What exactly is the issue with this and how does it violate Human Rights? They will still have their original citizenship?

    4. JoJoModding on

      In other words, strip citizenship from those protesting for the people of Gaza

    5. > Article 16 of Germany’s Constitution, the Basic Law, stipulates that “[n]o German may be deprived of his citizenship,” a clause that was introduced in response to the Nazi’s persecution of Jews

      Besides generally being a very biased article, even this quote of our constitution here is deliberately misleading. That sentence is immediately followed by

      > Der Verlust der Staatsangehörigkeit darf nur auf Grund eines Gesetzes und gegen den Willen des Betroffenen nur dann eintreten, wenn der Betroffene dadurch nicht staatenlos wird.

      which roughly translates to

      > Removal of citizenship can only happen on the basis of a law and, against the will of the person, only if it does not render them stateless.

      The proposed legislature here only talks about people with dual nationality, so nobody would become stateless here and our constitution is explicitly designed to allow this, so the quote from the article is maliciously misleading to create negative framing.

      The concerns about ambiguity of what an antisemite is is warranted, but we do still have courts for this, and this is a proposal expressing an intent, not a nearly-ready draft of legislature…

    6. chainedfredom on

      Its funny to see that CDU and SPD are introducing new Laws that in 4 or 8 years the AfD chancellor will use without even the need for making inhumane laws. Kinda read something similar somewhere

    7. Well HRW isn’t exactly a neutral and unbiased institution. Beside i consider all these imported radical ideologies and their followers as an endangerment of my human rights.

    Leave A Reply