AI in healthcare has a lot of potential to help doctors and nurses, but it can’t replace the human touch. How can we make sure AI helps with the technical side of care while still allowing nurses and doctors to connect with patients emotionally and socially?
Express_Classic_1569 on
AI in healthcare has a lot of potential to help doctors and nurses, but it can’t replace the human touch. How can we make sure AI helps with the technical side of care while still allowing nurses and doctors to connect with patients emotionally and socially?
Granum22 on
Nurses: Pay us living wages and adequately staff your hospitals!
Healthcare Corporations: How about we use this untested technology instead.
Nurses are most patients contact point with their healthcare. This is a truly idiotic idea.
Heroic_Folly on
Cost of labor has always been the primary driver for automation. The industrial revolution was a direct result of cheap labor leaving Europe to go to America.
The nursing shortage is real and dire, and nursing pay is through the roof as a result. Of course hospitals are willing to try anything to address that problem.
GnarlyNarwhalNoms on
The thing I don’t understand about the AI hype is that nobody seems concerned about reliability or consistency.
Sure, AI can be useful for coding, because if you know what you’re doing and it spits out nonsense, *you know better than to put that part into production.* It’s super useful *because there’s a human in the loop to fix it* when it fucke up. Everyone cherry-picks these (yes, impressive) examples of AI getting the right answer, but they don’t seem to care about all the wrong answers.
It’s a lot like those videos of dogs using a lawnmower or something. Yes, it’s nifty and cool and impressive that this dog can use a lawnmower, but *nobody is going to start a landscaping business and hire nothing but dogs.*
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
5 Kommentare
AI in healthcare has a lot of potential to help doctors and nurses, but it can’t replace the human touch. How can we make sure AI helps with the technical side of care while still allowing nurses and doctors to connect with patients emotionally and socially?
AI in healthcare has a lot of potential to help doctors and nurses, but it can’t replace the human touch. How can we make sure AI helps with the technical side of care while still allowing nurses and doctors to connect with patients emotionally and socially?
Nurses: Pay us living wages and adequately staff your hospitals!
Healthcare Corporations: How about we use this untested technology instead.
Nurses are most patients contact point with their healthcare. This is a truly idiotic idea.
Cost of labor has always been the primary driver for automation. The industrial revolution was a direct result of cheap labor leaving Europe to go to America.
The nursing shortage is real and dire, and nursing pay is through the roof as a result. Of course hospitals are willing to try anything to address that problem.
The thing I don’t understand about the AI hype is that nobody seems concerned about reliability or consistency.
Sure, AI can be useful for coding, because if you know what you’re doing and it spits out nonsense, *you know better than to put that part into production.* It’s super useful *because there’s a human in the loop to fix it* when it fucke up. Everyone cherry-picks these (yes, impressive) examples of AI getting the right answer, but they don’t seem to care about all the wrong answers.
It’s a lot like those videos of dogs using a lawnmower or something. Yes, it’s nifty and cool and impressive that this dog can use a lawnmower, but *nobody is going to start a landscaping business and hire nothing but dogs.*