Share.

    10 Kommentare

    1. Absolute insanity. We are throwing out 70 years of scientific progress on the whims of an unelected bureaucrat.

    2. lankamonkee on

      This article feels like a nothing burger. They are laying off 23 people with a good chuck of them being part of that D.E.I. arm (tbh writing was on the wall for this, Trump campaigned on striking down these initiatives). Another office is getting impacted, but the article makes VERY broad comments about its function.

      Other than alluding to future RIFs was anything significant to NASAs forward work really impacted? Nothing about Gateway, SLS or budget really mentioned here.

      Edit: It seems like the masses think that I don’t give a shit about the well-being of those laid off. I genuinely hope those who get impacted find jobs. My point is that this article is reframing these D.E.I. layoffs as some grand plan to shut down NASA.

    3. ‚Take the things that made America Great and flush them down the sh*tter‘

      FTFY

    4. shakamaboom on

      It’s 23 people. I get that it sucks but it’s not like NASA is running on the shoulders of 23 people

    5. NorCalJason75 on

      Relax homies. It’s 23 people total;

      „The employees of those offices, 23 in total, will be laid off.“

    6. Is the closure of the office of the Chief Scientist merely an effort to fire an accomplished woman? This is insane.

    7. SaturatedApe on

      Trump is great for space, best president ever for space……. empty office space!

    Leave A Reply